Add a bundle check step to ensure dependencies are correct

This should help prevent merge issues in the future, which caused !6814 to be needed.

See merge request !6815

Resolve "Move `/licenses` api endpoint to `/templates/licenses`"

## What does this MR do?

It moves the `/licenses`, `/gitignores` and `/gitlab_ci_ymls` API endpoints under the `/templates` namespace

## Why was this MR needed?

In EE we now have somewhat ambiguous API endpoints. `/license` refers to the EE license while `/licenses` (plural) refers to license templates. @DouweM mentioned that we're adding .gitignore templates in #14106 so it may make sense to add a /templates namespace. Then, move the /license templates endpoint to be underneath, along with .gitignore endpoints. 

Closes #17541

See merge request !5717

This reverts merge request !6730

Added documentation chapter for Git attributes

See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab_git/issues/28 for more information.

See merge request !6826

Use activerecord_sane_schema_dumper

## What does this MR do?

> `ActiveRecord::SaneSchemaDumper` modifies the behavior of Rails’ `ActiveRecord::SchemaDumper` so that the generated `db/schema.rb` file doesn’t contain any useless/harmful whitespace column alignment.

## Why was this MR needed?

To reduce potential conflicts in `db/schema.rb` (see https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/715).

See merge request !6827

As discussed in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab_git/issues/28 we'll
need to clearly document the need for .gitattributes files being encoded
using UTF-8.

[ci skip]

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

This should help prevent merge issues in the future, which caused !6814
to be needed.

API: New /users/:id/events endpoint

## What does this MR do?

If add a new `/users/:id/events` endpoint to retrieve a user's contribution events. The events returned are filtered so that only the events for projects that the current user can see are returned (similarly to what we do at the controller level).

## Why was this MR needed?

Because it's a nice feature to calculate leaderboards, for instance for #17815.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #20866.

See merge request !6771

Add disabled delete button to protected branches

## What does this MR do?
Add's a disabled CSS style for the delete button on protected branches instead of hiding the button

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22358

See merge request !6439

Speed up specs for GET /projects/:id/events

## What does this MR do?

Just groups some expectations into a single `it` block. Reduce this particular tests block time by half.

See merge request !6778

Removes inconsistency regarding tagging immediately as merged once you create a …

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #20708

See merge request !6408

The /licenses, /gitignores and /gitlab_ci_ymls endpoints are now also
available under a new /templates namespace. Old endpoints will be
deprecated when GitLab 9.0.0 is released.

Added 'Download' button to snippet view

## What does this MR do?

Adds a `Download` button above a snippet.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

Requested in #22811 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![image](/uploads/59b67aa02cc601c08a18fd60c37797ed/image.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #22811

See merge request !6720

Add CHANGELOG entry for 8.12.6



See merge request !6816

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Fix JS bug with select2 because of missing `data-field` attribute in select box.

Fix JS bug with select2 because of missing `data-field` attribute in select box.

Fixes #23193

See merge request !6812

API: Share projects only with groups current_user can access

Aims to address the issues here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23004

* Projects can be shared with non-existent groups
* Projects can be shared with groups that the current user does not have access to read

Concerns:

The new implementation of the API endpoint allows projects to be shared with a larger range of groups than can be done via the web UI.

The form for sharing a project with a group uses the following API endpoint to index the available groups: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/494269fc92f61098ee6bd635a0426129ce2c5456/lib/api/groups.rb#L17. The groups indexed in the web form will only be those groups that the user is currently a member of.

The new implementation allows projects to be shared with any group that the authenticated user has access to view. This widens the range of groups to those that are public and internal.

See merge request !2005
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

allow multiple labels commands

### What does this MR do?
This MR should add multiple command support  for all  label related commands.

### What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22965

See merge request !6780

Respond with 404 Not Found for non-existent tags

## What does this MR do?

Handles the case when a non-existent tag is being viewed, and responds with 404 Not Found instead of 500 Internal Server Error.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

The small changes should be clear from a simple diff.

## Why was this MR needed?

To resolve the issue #22211.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #22211

See merge request !6699

Ability to bulk assign issues to author of merge request

## What does this MR do?
Provides a link to auto-assign issues to the author of a merge request, when they are mentioned as being closed by the MR.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?


## Why was this MR needed?
To help avoid working on a MR without having assigned related issues to self

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #18876 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![ScreenShot-P216](/uploads/1af5e71a0a0ff0a60c5d7b54c0e09d9c/ScreenShot-P216.png)

## Tasks
- [x] Refactor or move away from using `BulkUpdateService`
- [x] ~~Consider alternate link message when only a subset of issues will be assigned~~
- [x] Minimize repeated calls to expensive `closes_issues` method
- [x] Move away from using inflector for pluralization and fix flash message
- [x] Change auth `before_action` and fallback to error flash message
- [x] Shouldn't overwrite current assignee if one exists

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5725

Make guests unable to view MRs

## What does this MR do?

Make guests unable to view MRs. This also fixes a bug when a non-member user could get notification if mentioned (in private project, it's OK for public project).

Now if you are a guest and you will be mentioned in one of the MRs you won't get a notification. 

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/1410

See merge request !6673

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Build instead create in label_link model spec

## What does this MR do?
This MR improves spec for label link model.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No

## Why was this MR needed?
Because for check validations, we can use build instead create a record in the database. 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
No

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- n/a [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- n/a [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- n/a API support added
- Tests
  - n/a Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- n/a [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !6792

Remove empty describe block on key spec model

## What does this MR do?
Removes unnecessary describe in test

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No

## Why was this MR needed?
It describe block not needed.

## Screenshots (if relevant)
No

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- n/a [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- n/a [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- n/a API support added
- Tests
  - n/a Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
No

See merge request !6793

Move some CHANGELOG entries to the 8.13.0 part

Spotted while reviewing https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/789/diffs#diff-1

[ci skip]

See merge request !6809

Spotted while reviewing
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/789/diffs#diff-1.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Move operations/ to new location

## What does this MR do?

Move operations/ to new location.

Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3349

## Moving docs to a new location?

See the guidelines: http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/doc_styleguide.html#changing-document-location

- [ ] Make sure the old link is not removed and has its contents replaced with a link to the new location.
- [ ] Make sure internal links pointing to the document in question are not broken.
- [ ] Search and replace any links referring to old docs in GitLab Rails app, specifically under the `app/views/` directory.
- [ ] If working on CE, submit an MR to EE with the changes as well.

See merge request !6519

Remove duplicate CHANGELOG entry

mail_room was bumped for 8.12.5.

See merge request !6806

[ci skip]

Allow browsing branches that end with '.atom'

## What does this MR do?

1. Simplify the regex capture in the routing for the CommitsController
   to not exclude the '.atom' suffix. That's a perfectly valid git
   branch name, so we shouldn't blow up if we get it.
2. Because Rails now can't automatically detect the request format, add
   some code to do so in `ExtractPath` when there is no path. This means
   that, given branches 'foo' and 'foo.atom', the Atom feed for the
   former is unroutable. To fix this: don't do that! Give the branches
   different names!

## Why was this MR needed?

Creating a branch or tag name ending in '.atom' would cause some 500s on that repo.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #21955. Related to !5994.

See merge request !6750