- 15 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
- 13 Aug, 2016 12 commits
-
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Connor Shea authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Timothy Andrew authored
- We weren't explicilty waiting for the page to load while navigating to the "Manage two-factor authentication" page. This was probably incidentally working for PhantomJS 1.x versions.
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
- 12 Aug, 2016 18 commits
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
Don't show new MR URL after push when it doesn't make sense See merge request !5786
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Add archived badge to project listing ## What does this MR do? Add an `archived` badge to the user project list, if the project is archived. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? Customer noted in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/33787 that there is no distinction for archived projects in the project dashboard/explore projects page. There is an archived badge on the admin projects page, though. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? ## Screenshots (if relevant) Existing admin projects page: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-12_at_3.54.37_PM](/uploads/d6ba44c2d3be1f78372792b5ac406672/Screen_Shot_2016-08-12_at_3.54.37_PM.png) New project list with archived badge: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-12_at_3.54.21_PM](/uploads/3fa8bb9fe7588575aace0761984929a7/Screen_Shot_2016-08-12_at_3.54.21_PM.png) See merge request !5798
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Drew Blessing authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
Fix bug where destroying a namespace would not always destroy projects There is a race condition in DestroyGroupService now that projects are deleted asynchronously: 1. User attempts to delete group 2. DestroyGroupService iterates through all projects and schedules a Sidekiq job to delete each Project 3. DestroyGroupService destroys the Group, leaving all its projects without a namespace 4. Projects::DestroyService runs later but the can?(current_user, :remove_project) is `false` because the user no longer has permission to destroy projects with no namespace. 5. This leaves the project in pending_delete state with no namespace/group. Projects without a namespace or group also adds another problem: it's not possible to destroy the container registry tags, since `container_registry_path_with_namespace` is the wrong value. The fix is to destroy the group asynchronously and run `execute` directly on Projects::DestroyService. Closes #17893 See merge request !4341
-
Douwe Maan authored
Update ruby 2.3.1 We where using 2.3.0, now 2.3.1 cc @connorshea See merge request !5790
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Resolve "Format branch, tag, and commit in environment list" ## What does this MR do? Updates Environments page rows to match the new pipeline updates ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I removed `private` from `avatars_helper.rb` so I could use `user_avatar`. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20059 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-08_at_11.44.36_AM](/uploads/62fbb475a7d9cc613fe5ba1715229553/Screen_Shot_2016-08-08_at_11.44.36_AM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-08_at_11.44.41_AM](/uploads/ce1bd3ab62c0bc8091e9b6f85012ed36/Screen_Shot_2016-08-08_at_11.44.41_AM.png) See merge request !5687
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Instrument Project.visible_to_user ## What does this MR do? This MR instruments `Project.visible_to_user` ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? The method in question was not instrumented due to being a Rails scope. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #12425 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5793
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Improve pipeline processing ## What does this MR do? This works on top of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 trying to solve some edge cases introduced by that Merge Request. The fix switches to a state machine which is already a part of `Ci::Pipeline` and uses events with conditional transitions to switch between pipeline states. This is approach is much more bullet proof and much easier to understand than a previous one where we were calling a `reload_status!` which manually updated `status`. Previous approach become confusing and prone to number of errors. ## Why was this MR needed? This improves changes introduced by https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 ## What are the relevant issue numbers? None, yet. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Not needed. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added (not needed since changelog for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 is already introduced) - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added (not needed) - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug (most of tests do cover the triggering of Pipeline) - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5782
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Because this method is a Rails scope we have to instrument it manually as regular the instrumentation methods only instrument methods defined directly on a Class or Module.
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Corrected links/usernames in performance guide ## What does this MR do? This fixes two broken links in the performance guide and removes the mention of Josh as he no longer works for GitLab. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? The guide contained two broken links, and Josh no longer works for GitLab. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? None. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5772
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
- 11 Aug, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
Remove unused SpamReport model; this was renamed to SpamLog See merge request !5778
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Stan Hu authored
There is a race condition in DestroyGroupService now that projects are deleted asynchronously: 1. User attempts to delete group 2. DestroyGroupService iterates through all projects and schedules a Sidekiq job to delete each Project 3. DestroyGroupService destroys the Group, leaving all its projects without a namespace 4. Projects::DestroyService runs later but the can?(current_user, :remove_project) is `false` because the user no longer has permission to destroy projects with no namespace. 5. This leaves the project in pending_delete state with no namespace/group. Projects without a namespace or group also adds another problem: it's not possible to destroy the container registry tags, since container_registry_path_with_namespace is the wrong value. The fix is to destroy the group asynchronously and to run execute directly on Projects::DestroyService. Closes #17893
-
Robert Speicher authored
Resolve "New pipeline auto-completion" ## What does this MR do? Add auto-completion to new pipeline. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19725 See merge request !5389
-
ula budziszewska authored
-
ubudzisz authored
update CHANGELOG add auto-completion into pipeline add auto-completion into pipeline add auto-completion into pipeline update changelog modify tests remove empty lines add auto-completion into pipeline update changelog modify tests switch text_field_tag into text_field add test to new field switch context into describe Update CHANGELOG render only commit title update CHANGELOG add auto-completion into pipeline add auto-completion into pipeline add auto-completion into pipeline update changelog modify tests remove empty lines add auto-completion into pipeline update changelog modify tests update changelog Update CHANGELOG add indetation add tests to pipeline ref change file name for tests change file name for spec tests remove empty line rename test it rename test name removing unexpected changes removing unexpected changes2 update changelog
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-