Fetch runner type in runner details using graphql

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60019

Github Importer: Add Cache to Pull Request Reviews importer

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60668

Fix a typo in Feature Flag rollout template

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60964

Remove duplicate users and filter out nulls from projectMembers query

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60890

Decouple LimitedCapacity::Worker from Sidekiq queue depth

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60415

Clean up `validate_release_description_length` feature flag [RUN ALL RSPEC] [RUN AS-IF-FOSS]

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60892

Track users awarding epic emoji via usage ping

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60787

Refactor DAST Site Profile form

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60650

Mount vulnerability report when feature flag is on

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60959

Add expect_snowplow_event instead of Gitlab::Tracking

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60807

Add more links to compliance capabilities in docs

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60744

Remove user from rotation if removed from project/group

## What does this MR do?

<!--

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why.

Are there any risks involved with the proposed change? What additional
test coverage is introduced to offset the risk?

Please keep this description up-to-date with any discussion that takes
place so that reviewers can understand your intent. This is especially
important if they didn't participate in the discussion.

-->


This adds a service to remove a user from an On-call Rotation.

We ensure that the rotation is up to date by running the job top persist current shifts. Then, we update the `is_removed` boolean on the Participant model associated to the user/rotation.

Deletion from rotations are scoped to the member being removed:

- If a member is a project member, only that project's rotations are affected
- If a member is a group member, all of the projects within that group are affected

**Why don't we use the existing [`EditRotationService`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/9c35c043a9ce9d70bd30ec6dc0d30991bf15ab29/ee/app/services/incident_management/oncall_rotations/edit_service.rb) service?**
The `EditRotationService` requires you to provide all `participant` params for all remaining participants, and in a format which requires the `user`, `color_palette`, `color_weight` etc. Rather than modify the `EditRotationService` to  make this easier, I chose to make a specific service for this use case.


SQL queries for finder:

Single Project:

Explain: https://explain.depesz.com/s/QToy

SQL: 
```sql
  User Load (0.5ms)  SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = 1 LIMIT 1 /*application:console,line:/ee/app/finders/incident_management/member_oncall_rotations_finder.rb:11:in `initialize'*/

  Project Load (0.5ms)  SELECT "projects".* FROM "projects" WHERE "projects"."id" = 4302 LIMIT 1 /*application:console,line:/ee/app/finders/incident_management/member_oncall_rotations_finder.rb:15:in `execute'*/
  
  IncidentManagement::OncallRotation Load (4.5ms)  SELECT "incident_management_oncall_rotations".* FROM "incident_management_oncall_rotations" INNER JOIN "incident_management_oncall_participants" ON "incident_management_oncall_rotations"."id" = "incident_management_oncall_participants"."oncall_rotation_id" INNER JOIN "incident_management_oncall_schedules" ON "incident_management_oncall_schedules"."id" = "incident_management_oncall_rotations"."oncall_schedule_id" WHERE "incident_management_oncall_participants"."user_id" = 1 AND "incident_management_oncall_schedules"."project_id" = 4302 

```

Group member, multiple projects:

Explain: https://explain.depesz.com/s/3sxa

SQL: 
```sql
  User Load (0.7ms)  SELECT "users".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = 1 LIMIT 1

  Namespace Load (0.5ms)  SELECT "namespaces".* FROM "namespaces" WHERE "namespaces"."id" = 4374 LIMIT 1

  IncidentManagement::OncallRotation Load (1.1ms)  SELECT "incident_management_oncall_rotations".* FROM "incident_management_oncall_rotations" INNER JOIN "incident_management_oncall_participants" ON "incident_management_oncall_rotations"."id" = "incident_management_oncall_participants"."oncall_rotation_id" INNER JOIN "incident_management_oncall_schedules" ON "incident_management_oncall_schedules"."id" = "incident_management_oncall_rotations"."oncall_schedule_id" WHERE "incident_management_oncall_participants"."user_id" = 1 AND "incident_management_oncall_schedules"."project_id" IN (SELECT "projects"."id" FROM "projects" WHERE "projects"."namespace_id" = 4374)
```

## Screenshots  (strongly suggested)

<!-- 

Please include any relevant screenshots that will assist reviewers and
future readers. If you need help visually verifying the change, please 
leave a comment and ping a GitLab reviewer, maintainer, or MR coach.

-->

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

### Conformity

- 📋 [Does this MR need a changelog?](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/changelog.html#what-warrants-a-changelog-entry)
  - [x] I have included a changelog entry.
  - [ ] I have not included a changelog entry because _____.
- [ ] [Documentation](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/workflow.html) ([if required](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/workflow/#when-documentation-is-required))
- [x] [Code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html)
- [ ] [Merge request performance guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] [Style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/style_guides.md)
- [x] [Database guides](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database_review.html)
- [x] [Separation of EE specific content](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/ee_features.html#separation-of-ee-code)

### Availability and Testing

<!-- What risks does this change pose? How might it affect the quality/performance of the product?
What additional test coverage or changes to tests will be needed?
Will it require cross-browser testing?
See the test engineering process for further guidelines: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/test-engineering/ -->

<!-- If cross-browser testing is not required, please remove the relevant item, or mark it as not needed: [-] -->

- [ ] [Review and add/update tests for this feature/bug](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/testing_guide/index.html). Consider [all test levels](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/testing_guide/testing_levels.html). See the [Test Planning Process](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/test-engineering).
- [ ] [Tested in all supported browsers](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/install/requirements.html#supported-web-browsers)
- [ ] Informed Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change, if applicable per [definition of done](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/merge_request_workflow.html#definition-of-done)

### Security

If this MR contains changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods and other items described in [the security review guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/security/#when-to-request-a-security-review):

- [ ] Label as ~security and @ mention `@gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec`
- [ ] The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
- [ ] Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team 


Related to #323631

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!59427

This adds a service to remove a user from an On-call Rotation.

We ensure that the rotation is up to date by running the job
top persist current shifts. Then, we update the `is_removed`
boolean on the Participant model associated to the
user/rotation.

Deletion from rotations are scoped to the member being removed:

- If a member is a project member, only that project's rotations
  are affected
- If a member is a group member, all of the projects within that
  group are affected

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/323631

Added award emoji to the epics public API

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60410

Fix N+1 problem in CustomEmojiFilter

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60910

Contributes to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/271242

**Problem**

I discovered repetitive `SELECT 1 AS one FROM "custom_emoji" WHERE
"custom_emoji"."namespace_id" = <id> LIMIT 1` queries generated by
CustomEmojiFilter.

**Solution**

- Update test to catch N+1 queries
- Add memoization to prevent them

Check for category and action to be nil

Add CI template field to project GraphQL type

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60276

Resolve "Document in GitLab docs how to create HAR files"

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!47835

Fix incorrect MR popovers

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60878

Update to be clear only applies to default

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60865

Documentation: add 'Security considerations' section to token_overview.md

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60761

Docs: Add note on TCP requirement for existing Gitaly

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60673

Check duplicate package regex against version as well as name

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60760

Proposal for Redis slots name for events tracked using Redis HLL

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60477

Reorganize learn gitlab specs

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60729

Validate foreign key on GroupHooks

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60527

Fix not implemented error

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60741

Fix authorizations for epic boards

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60742

fix: Propagate tracking feature flag to CI report parsers

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60872

Update default branch name in FE specs

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60820

Create table user_credit_card_validations

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60626

Populate timelogs.project_id

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!60439