Pipelines page redesign

Closes #23637
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-15_at_1.36.34_PM](/uploads/edc6a58f00cca3e03ffd1689bd6eebd8/Screen_Shot_2016-11-15_at_1.36.34_PM.png)

See merge request !7487

Fix misaligned buttons on admin builds page

## What does this MR do?
Fix misaligned buttons on admin builds page

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No

## Why was this MR needed?
Because buttons are misaligned.

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![fix-admin-ci-table](/uploads/49472f7a12f868556e1bf482c9f837c4/fix-admin-ci-table.gif)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #24371

See merge request !7424

Add environment info to builds page

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-02_at_5.44.01_PM](/uploads/3443d9518997147d1e6f41830e3774ff/Screen_Shot_2016-11-02_at_5.44.01_PM.png)

Closes #23205

See merge request !7251

Pass correct tag target to post-receive hook when creating tag via UI

Fixes #24437

See merge request !7556

Remove title from skipped status svg

Closes #24617

See merge request !7570

Resolve "spec/lib/gitlab/backend/shell_spec.rb causes other specs to fail"

## What does this MR do?

It ensures we rely on `Gitlab::Shell`'s public API and not on its internal. Since `Gitlab::Shell` is caching the value of its token, the only way to get the correct token is to call `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token`, not to read the `Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell.secret_file` file!

Fixes #24599

See merge request !7557

add parsing support for incoming html email

## What does this MR do?
Fixes #18388 by adding support for parsing HTML email

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The new class, Gitlab::Email::HTMLParser, which needs to translate the HTML content to text and also delete replies, as they are not necessarily in the correct format to be caught by EmailReplyParser. The solution I found that should work for any HTML-formatted email is to remove all `<table>` and `<blockquote>` tags. Actual `<table>` elements (to be interpreted by markdown) should already be encoded with e.g. `&lt;table&gt;` - the only failure mode is if there is an *actual* HTML table in the content itself, which we wouldn't be able to support easily anyways.

The gem `html2text` traverses the HTML tree and outputs text - and markdown in the case of HTML links or images.

See merge request !7397

Improve consistency of empty todo list messages

- They all now end with punctuation
- Not everyone enjoys, or can even drink, coffee
- The "High five!" message had no context for why we were high-fiving
- "Henceforth" is one word

[ci skip]

See merge request !7572

Precalculate authorized projects in database

## What does this MR do?
It caches user's authorized projects in database instead of using multiple unions, which should simplify and speed-up things since this operation (getting authorized projects) is used a lot.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Did we miss a scenario where we need to refresh the list of projects?

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23150 

See merge request !6839

Less intrusive system note

## What does this MR do?
This MR is for making system notes less intrusive by implementing proposed design
 
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
System notes are reusing in issues, commits and MR discussions. May need to double check to make sure that the design is not breaking anywhere

## Why was this MR needed?
This merge request solve issue #19797 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
**Before:**
![merge-request-before](/uploads/91953598087a613078d80333a43815a7/merge-request-before.png)
**After**
![2016-11-15_17.41.46](/uploads/c809ba53cc34ee83bb439ed741dc39f3/2016-11-15_17.41.46.gif)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#19797, #23129

See merge request !6755

Cycle Analytics: Events per stage

Adds list of events to each stage:

- Issue: list of issues created in the last XX days, that have been labeled or added to a milestone.
- Plan: list of commits that reference for the fist time an issue from the last stage.
- Code: list of MR created in this stage
- Test: List of unique builds triggered by the commits.
- Review: List of MR merged
- Staging: List of deployed builds
- Production: list of issues with the time from idea to production

Fixes #23449 

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !6859

Fix some failing specs due to missing access_requestable trait

See merge request !7510

Fix POST /internal/allowed to cope with gitlab-shell v4.0.0 project paths

Closes #24496

See merge request !7480

fix shibboleth misconfigurations resulting in authentication bypass

This merge request fixes #22267 where a misconfigured Shibboleth `HTTP_UID` or `HTTP_EPPN` could result in users being logged into an account that did not belong to them.

See merge request !7428

Fix issue where "Without projects" filter admin area shows 0 users incorrectly. Before this fix, if any outstanding group or project invitations exist the count show as 0.

Fixes #3367

See merge request !6611

Allow commit note to be visible if repo is visible

## What does this MR do?

It enforces the `:download_code` permission in `Event#visible_to_user?` for commit notes.

Closes #23824

See merge request !7504

Stopped multiple requests with dropdowns

## What does this MR do?

Fixes an issue where the user dropdown would send 2 requests when the user opens the dropdown.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #24131

See merge request !7505

Fixed issue boards counter border when unauthorized

## What does this MR do?

When the user is unauthorized & view issue boards, the border on the counter will not be the whole way around. This fixes that. 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_13.03.36](/uploads/54d97f7f4114044aad3bdc78961a31c8/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_13.03.36.png)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #23664

See merge request !7501

Defer saving project services to the database if there are no user changes

## What does this MR do?

It defers saving project services to the database as long as it is possible. It creates a project service when creating a project only if this project service has an active template. After that project services are saved on the first edit.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

- tests that used `build_missing_services` before the change
- number of queries executed

## Why was this MR needed?

Motivation in #22281

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #22281

See merge request !6958

Search for a filename in a project

Closes #23117

See merge request !7426

Opening the user dropdown currently sends 2 requests. This has been changed so only one is sent

Closes #24131

Disable the "request access" functionality by default for new groups and projects

Currently this feature is enabled by default, and additional action is required to disable it.

Closes #21992 
Closes !7011

See merge request !7425

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

gitlab-shell v3.6.6 would give project paths like so:

* namespace/project

gitlab-shell v4.0.0 can give project paths like so:

* /namespace1/namespace2/project
* /namespace/project
* /path/to/repository/storage/namespace1/namespace2/project
* /path/to/repository/storage/namespace/project

Fix UX Guide link on Contributing.md

Current link on the CONTRIBUTING.md page was to the old UI Guide. This should be updated to the new link.

See merge request !7493

Move 'Explore Snippets' Spinach feature to Rspec

## What does this MR do?
It moves the `features/snippets/discover.feature` Spinach test to a Rspec feature.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The original feature was called 'Discover Snippets', but the UI no longer reflects this wording. The new Rspec feature is called 'Explore Snippets' to reflect UI/Controller/View naming in use.

## Why was this MR needed?
As part of deprecating the Spinach test suite.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [-] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [-] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [-] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23036

See merge request !7349

Do not create a MergeRequestDiff record when source branch is deleted

Fixes #23413 
Fixes #23897

See merge request !7481

Limit labels returned for a specific project as an administrator

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24527

See merge request !7496

Use setter for key instead AR callback

## What does this MR do?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- n/a [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- n/a API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6763

See merge request !7488

fix labels API adding missing parameter (current_user)

See merge request !7458

Fix a badly-performing migration

See merge request !7483

Move 'Search Snippets' Spinach feature to Rspec

## What does this MR do?
Moves the Spinach feature `features/snippet_search.feature` to an RSpec feature `spec/features/snippets/search_snippets_spec.rb`.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

The search results page URL was being visited directly in the original Spinach test, using an encoded search query and specific parameters to trigger the snippet searches. I have changed the RSpect feature to fill in the search box on the snippets dashboard page to retrieve results to cover the missing test coverage on the search box and to avoid the feature test from relying on the implementation details of the search URL structure.

## Why was this MR needed?

As part of deprecating the Spinach test suite.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [-] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [-] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [-] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

#23036

See merge request !7494

Improved redis sentinel documentation

## What does this MR do?
Updates Redis Sentinel documentation (most Omnibus stuff).

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Grammar / Documentation

## Why was this MR needed?
After this https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/merge_requests/1000 get merged, people will need to follow new instructions.

## Checklist

- Documentation follows Sentinel best-practices:
  - [x] Suggests amount of sentinel nodes
  - [x] Suggests amount of redis nodes
  - [x] Suggests quorum value according to recomended amount of sentinel nodes
  - [x] Describes how to define quorum according to best-practices
  - [x] Lists ports and firewall checklist
- [x] Following Documentation bring us to a working environment
- [ ] Documentation is clear and have no gramatical issue

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab#1565

See merge request !6471

Prior, an administrator viewing a project's Labels page would see _all_
labels from every project they had access to, rather than only the
labels of that specific project (if any).

This was not an information disclosure, as admins have access to
everything, but it was a performance issue.

When unauthorized the border on the counter in issue boards didn't span the whole way around

Closes #23664

[ci skip]

[ci skip]