Run Sidekiq in inline mode to ensure indexing occurs in spec



See merge request !651

Add test coverage badge

## What does this MR do?

This MR adds a test coverage badge.

Test coverage badge will be a SVG image you can embed in README.md or on your website that will be created dynamically by GitLab, to show information about how much of the code is being covered by tests. In addition to coverage-regexp feature we currently have, this feature will make it possible to use the coverage data obtained from the build log. We will support both - pipeline coverage, or test coverage for particular job in the pipeline. 

![coverage_badges](/uploads/dfa307339eb58c8138e551b42c0d8756/coverage_badges.png)

![coverage_badge](/uploads/30406e4bdcf979b2900ffe8996728c97/coverage_badge.png)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #3714

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5708

Fix pipeline and build seeds in development environment

## What does this MR do?

When we depend on state machine events in seeds, it is likely that we will break fixtures from time to time because when transition rules change, using events most likely invalidates some objects in seeds

## Why was this MR needed?

Pipeline and build seeds were broken in development environment.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #20933

See merge request !5810

When we depend on state machine events in seeds, it is likely that we
will break fixtures from time to time because when transition rules
change, using events most likely invalidates some objects in seeds.

Add method missing from EE

## Why was this MR needed?

`ProjectWiki#repository_exists?` is present in EE but not on CE, and there's no particular reason why it shouldn't

See merge request !5802

Show deployment status on a MR view

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Resolves #19571, one in the list of #19992

## Screenshots (if relevant)

external_url = nil
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.57.03](/uploads/20ea1587eea556c7a1acd0ff726a5bfb/Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.57.03.png)

external_url != nil
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.59.59](/uploads/0094b9ddece3f4bf76c83988840c096d/Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.59.59.png)

Note, the timings are weird between merging and deploying, that is because I did it in the wrong order.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing

See merge request !5622

Limit the size of SVGs when viewing them as blobs

## What does this MR do?

This MR prevents rendering of SVG blobs larger than 2 MB.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

I couldn't figure out how to properly test the view for this as this requires a large SVG (inflating the repository size) _or_ stubbing, the latter doesn't really seem possible using Spinach and all the stuff potentially involved.

## Why was this MR needed?

When rendering large SVG blobs (e.g. 20 MB files) a request may time out and consume a lot of memory.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

#1435

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![svg_notice](/uploads/c8de32522eda95a41a24555c3f85bfc1/svg_notice.jpg)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

cc @jschatz1 @annabeldunstone (there are some UI changes, see the above screenshot).

See merge request !5794

Update changelog



See merge request !649

[ES] Improved code search

Changelog item is already there

See merge request !648

CE upstream

@ayufan Please resolve conflicts:

```
Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)

	deleted by them: app/services/create_commit_builds_service.rb
	both modified:   app/services/git_push_service.rb
	both modified:   app/services/git_tag_push_service.rb
	both modified:   spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
	both modified:   spec/requests/ci/api/builds_spec.rb
```

@ayufan Assigned to you since you are the author https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/39203f1adfc6fee3eca50f0cab99ffc597865200

/cc @jacobvosmaer-gitlab 

See merge request !644

Use new PhantomJS version

## What does this MR do?
Makes CI builds to use PhantomJS 2.1.1.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5740

Try to get back todo's cache or at least avoid hitting the database

See merge request !5789

Speed up todos queries by limiting the projects set we join with

See merge request !5791