- 17 Aug, 2016 12 commits
-
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
Added VueJS plugin ## What does this MR do? Adds the VueJS & Vue resource plugin with environment detection. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20738 See merge request !5845
-
Douwe Maan authored
Fix downtime check formatting ## What does this MR do? This MR adjusts the formatting of the migration downtime checker so messages are more readable. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Not specifically ## Why was this MR needed? Formatting was somewhat hard to read and the online/offline indicators used the wrong colour. ## New Format ``` [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20140407135544_fix_namespaces.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160705054938_add_protected_branches_push_access.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160705054952_add_protected_branches_merge_access.rb [offline]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160705055254_move_from_developers_can_merge_to_protected_branches_merge_access.rb: We're creating a `merge_access_level` for each `protected_branch`. If a user creates a `protected_branch` while this is running, we might be left with a `protected_branch` _without_ an associated `merge_access_level`. The `protected_branches` table must not change while this is running, so downtime is required. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5081#note_13247410 [offline]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160705055308_move_from_developers_can_push_to_protected_branches_push_access.rb: We're creating a `push_access_level` for each `protected_branch`. If a user creates a `protected_branch` while this is running, we might be left with a `protected_branch` _without_ an associated `push_access_level`. The `protected_branches` table must not change while this is running, so downtime is required. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5081#note_13247410 [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160705055809_remove_developers_can_push_from_protected_branches.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160705055813_remove_developers_can_merge_from_protected_branches.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160716115711_add_queued_at_to_ci_builds.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160725083350_add_external_url_to_enviroments.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160727163552_create_user_agent_details.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160728081025_add_pipeline_events_to_web_hooks.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160728103734_add_pipeline_events_to_services.rb [offline]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160729173930_remove_project_id_from_spam_logs.rb: Removing a column that contains data that is not used anywhere. [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160801163709_add_submitted_as_ham_to_spam_logs.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160802010328_remove_builds_enable_index_on_projects.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160805041956_add_deleted_at_to_namespaces.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160810102349_remove_ci_runner_trigram_indexes.rb [online]: /home/yorickpeterse/Projects/gitlab/gitlab-ce/db/migrate/20160810142633_remove_redundant_indexes.rb ``` ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5840
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Yorick Peterse authored
This removes excessive whitespace from the messages (e.g. leading whitespace) and ensures the message is more clearly visible.
-
Sean McGivern authored
These JS errors are only thrown in PhantomJS, and enough of the page is rendered properly that this spec passes. We should remove this in future.
-
Yorick Peterse authored
The colours were incorrect: offline was green and online was red, instead of the opposite.
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Move to project dropdown with infinite scroll for better performance See merge request !5828
-
Paco Guzman authored
Use just SQL to check is a user can admin_issue on a project Tradeoff - we duplicate how we check admin_issue in a SQL relation in the Ability class
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Fix error message for existing labels in right sidebar. ## What does this MR do? Fixes flash notification in right sidebar, if we want to create an existing label. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Nope. ## Why was this MR needed? Because it was broken. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes #20117 ## Screenshots (if relevant) #### Before ![https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/c1fa7e98d1a3f0daaf8197809bbb26d0/Screen_Shot_2016-07-22_at_11.33.35.png](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/c1fa7e98d1a3f0daaf8197809bbb26d0/Screen_Shot_2016-07-22_at_11.33.35.png) #### After ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-28_at_13.38.03](/uploads/1dca73bf4c1b14c0044952a5032d9325/Screen_Shot_2016-07-28_at_13.38.03.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-28_at_13.41.18](/uploads/9b814f7f03d0314050659e1ac6ace290/Screen_Shot_2016-07-28_at_13.41.18.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [ ] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~ - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5546
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Don't show comment button in gutter of diffs on MR discussion tab When browsing to an MR, switching to the Changes tab, and switching back to the Discussions tab, the gutter of the diffs on that page would show the comment button on-hover, while it shouldn't, since comments on new lines can only be created from the Changes tab. ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-25_at_22.01.11](/uploads/6b044e1a3ecb34ddaa0af432833473aa/Screen_Shot_2016-07-25_at_22.01.11.png) `8-10-stable` counterpart at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5493 See merge request !5492
-
- 16 Aug, 2016 28 commits
-
-
Patricio Cano authored
Updated Akismet documentation Updated Akismet documentation See merge request !5821
-
Robert Speicher authored
[ci skip]
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Add hover state to todos ## What does this MR do? - Add a hover state to todos like for repository files. - Fix button alignment in todos - Add link to avatar in todos ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? The `border-collapse` part—is there any better way? ## Why was this MR needed? Make hover states consistent. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? fixes #19833 ## Screenshots ### Before ![before](/uploads/cd2e7b234bf08fac48aebb60cdfa26a9/before.png) ### After ![todos-list](/uploads/592457050cb3ff2c43dfcce78418c50b/todos-list.png) ![todos-list-last-hover](/uploads/532714333bc74d1656a5c767012b4cdd/todos-list-last-hover.png) ![todos-mobile](/uploads/d542b04ddebc9d4354d57151dd04c0d2/todos-mobile.png) See merge request !5361
-
Patricio Cano authored
-
winniehell authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Changed project description width ## What does this MR do? Changes the width of the project description to a max of `700px` ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20020 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-21_at_12.51.59](/uploads/567f5b11553b45baa7fb07156e46b727/Screen_Shot_2016-07-21_at_12.51.59.png) See merge request !5397
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Fixed width on project visibility icon in project list ## What does this MR do? Gives fixed width to the project visibility icons in the project list so that they all correctly line up with each other. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19583 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-07_at_12.49.58](/uploads/bffa097c5c0e0a1339bbd4d7ea15d84f/Screen_Shot_2016-07-07_at_12.49.58.png) See merge request !5137
-
Robert Speicher authored
Implement pipeline hooks, extracted from !5525 Closes #20115 See merge request !5620
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Highlight empty lines ## What does this MR do? Rather than just highlight the text, file line highlighting now highlights the full line including empty lines ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19484 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-05_at_13.52.31](/uploads/d3bddc918d731681465381e96c0aa2b0/Screen_Shot_2016-07-05_at_13.52.31.png) See merge request !5092
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
Load issue templates from repository part of #18656 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !4981
-
Douwe Maan authored
Backport changes from gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!581 ## What does this MR do? Backports changes that were made in gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!581, to avoid potential merge conflicts in the future. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? - Related to gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!581 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? ## Tasks - [ ] !5824 Backport changes from EE!581 to CE - [x] Implementation - [x] ::ProtectedBranches::CreateService.new - [x] Can't remove `load_protected_branches_gon_variables` - [x] `has_many` with count enforced - [x] Extract from access levels - [x] project.protected_branches.create(params) - [x] Improve "access_levels.first" - [x] Fix tests - [x] Fix build - [x] Assign to Douwe - [ ] Wait for review/merge See merge request !5824
-
Felipe Artur authored
-
Timothy Andrew authored
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Added documentation on adding database indexes ## What does this MR do? This MR adds a guide on when to add database indexes, how to approach this problem, etc ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Spelling, grammar, etc ## Why was this MR needed? Blindly adding indexes can be harmful to the database, and I recently had to remove 48-something unused indexes. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #20767 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5771
-
Timothy Andrew authored
- Use assertions in the vein of `merge_access_levels.map(&:access_level)` instead of `merge_access_levels.first.access_level`
-
Rubén Dávila Santos authored
Revert "Merge branch '19957-write-tests-for-adding-comments-for-different-line-types-in-diff' into 'master'" This reverts merge request !5417
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Add reference to product map. ## What does this MR do? Mention the product map in the UI Guide and remove a line that says that the GitLab logo and user picture and in the sidebar. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? 19350 - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) Closes #19350 See merge request !5769
-
Timothy Andrew authored
- `#find_users` depends on a project being loaded. - Missed adding this in 2193ae22
-
Timothy Andrew authored
- This is an optimization that was made in !581, and it needs to be backported to CE to avoid merge conflicts in the future.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
- Previously created a protected branch manually, without using a factory.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. `GitPushService` was still using `{merge,push}_access_level_attributes` instead of `{merge,push}_access_levels_attributes`. 2. The branches API creates access levels regardless of the state of the `developers_can_{push,merge}` parameters. This is in line with the UI, where Master access is the default for a new protected branch. 3. Use `after(:build)` to create access levels in the `protected_branches` factory, so that `factories_spec` passes. It only builds records, so we need to create access levels on `build` as well.
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. Previously, we were using `after_create` to create access levels. 2. At the time of protected branch creation, there are _no_ access levels present, which is invalid, and creation fails. 3. Fixed by setting access levels before the protected branch is created.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. Change a few incorrect `access_level` to `access_levels.first` that were missed in e805a647. 2. `API::Entities` can iterate over all access levels instead of just the first one. This makes no difference to CE, and makes it more compatible with EE.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. To improve EE compatibility.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. This is in regard to the protected branches feature spec. 2. For example, if "Masters" is already selected, don't re-select "Masters" during the spec. 3. This is due to a bug in the frontend implementation, where selecting an already-selected access level _deselects_ it, which is something we don't need. I'll create a separate issue for this. 4. This hasn't turned up before, because we were manually creating missing access levels prior to e805a647. Now, we just use nested attributes, and missing access levels fail validation.
-