-
Sergey Senozhatsky authored
We have a proper 'overflow' check which tells us that we need to split up existing cont buffer in separate records: if (cont.len + len > sizeof(cont.buf)) cont_flush(); At the same time we also have one extra flush: "if cont buffer is 80% full then split it up" in cont_add(): if (cont.len > (sizeof(cont.buf) * 80) / 100) cont_flush(); This looks to be redundant, since the existing "overflow" check should work just fine, so remove this 80% check and wait for either a normal cont termination \n, for preliminary flush due to possible buffer overflow or for preliminary flush due to cont race. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002023836.4487-4-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
0e96a19c