• David Howells's avatar
    FS-Cache: Handle pages pending storage that get evicted under OOM conditions · 201a1542
    David Howells authored
    Handle netfs pages that the vmscan algorithm wants to evict from the pagecache
    under OOM conditions, but that are waiting for write to the cache.  Under these
    conditions, vmscan calls the releasepage() function of the netfs, asking if a
    page can be discarded.
    
    The problem is typified by the following trace of a stuck process:
    
    	kslowd005     D 0000000000000000     0  4253      2 0x00000080
    	 ffff88001b14f370 0000000000000046 ffff880020d0d000 0000000000000007
    	 0000000000000006 0000000000000001 ffff88001b14ffd8 ffff880020d0d2a8
    	 000000000000ddf0 00000000000118c0 00000000000118c0 ffff880020d0d2a8
    	Call Trace:
    	 [<ffffffffa00782d8>] __fscache_wait_on_page_write+0x8b/0xa7 [fscache]
    	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
    	 [<ffffffffa0078240>] ? __fscache_check_page_write+0x63/0x70 [fscache]
    	 [<ffffffffa00b671d>] nfs_fscache_release_page+0x4e/0xc4 [nfs]
    	 [<ffffffffa00927f0>] nfs_release_page+0x3c/0x41 [nfs]
    	 [<ffffffff810885d3>] try_to_release_page+0x32/0x3b
    	 [<ffffffff81093203>] shrink_page_list+0x316/0x4ac
    	 [<ffffffff8109372b>] shrink_inactive_list+0x392/0x67c
    	 [<ffffffff813532fa>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x100/0x10b
    	 [<ffffffff81058df0>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
    	 [<ffffffff8135330e>] ? mutex_unlock+0x9/0xb
    	 [<ffffffff81093aa2>] shrink_list+0x8d/0x8f
    	 [<ffffffff81093d1c>] shrink_zone+0x278/0x33c
    	 [<ffffffff81052d6c>] ? ktime_get_ts+0xad/0xba
    	 [<ffffffff81094b13>] try_to_free_pages+0x22e/0x392
    	 [<ffffffff81091e24>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x212
    	 [<ffffffff8108e743>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3dc/0x5cf
    	 [<ffffffff81089529>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x65/0xaa
    	 [<ffffffff8110f8c0>] ext3_write_begin+0x78/0x1eb
    	 [<ffffffff81089ec5>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x109/0x28c
    	 [<ffffffff8103cb69>] ? current_fs_time+0x22/0x29
    	 [<ffffffff8108a509>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x350/0x385
    	 [<ffffffff8108a588>] ? generic_file_aio_write+0x4a/0xae
    	 [<ffffffff8108a59e>] generic_file_aio_write+0x60/0xae
    	 [<ffffffff810b2e82>] do_sync_write+0xe3/0x120
    	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
    	 [<ffffffff810b18e1>] ? __dentry_open+0x1a5/0x2b8
    	 [<ffffffff810b1a76>] ? dentry_open+0x82/0x89
    	 [<ffffffffa00e693c>] cachefiles_write_page+0x298/0x335 [cachefiles]
    	 [<ffffffffa0077147>] fscache_write_op+0x178/0x2c2 [fscache]
    	 [<ffffffffa0075656>] fscache_op_execute+0x7a/0xd1 [fscache]
    	 [<ffffffff81082093>] slow_work_execute+0x18f/0x2d1
    	 [<ffffffff8108239a>] slow_work_thread+0x1c5/0x308
    	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
    	 [<ffffffff810821d5>] ? slow_work_thread+0x0/0x308
    	 [<ffffffff8104be91>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
    	 [<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
    	 [<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
    	 [<ffffffff8102ef83>] ? tg_shares_up+0x171/0x227
    	 [<ffffffff8104be17>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
    	 [<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
    
    In the above backtrace, the following is happening:
    
     (1) A page storage operation is being executed by a slow-work thread
         (fscache_write_op()).
    
     (2) FS-Cache farms the operation out to the cache to perform
         (cachefiles_write_page()).
    
     (3) CacheFiles is then calling Ext3 to perform the actual write, using Ext3's
         standard write (do_sync_write()) under KERNEL_DS directly from the netfs
         page.
    
     (4) However, for Ext3 to perform the write, it must allocate some memory, in
         particular, it must allocate at least one page cache page into which it
         can copy the data from the netfs page.
    
     (5) Under OOM conditions, the memory allocator can't immediately come up with
         a page, so it uses vmscan to find something to discard
         (try_to_free_pages()).
    
     (6) vmscan finds a clean netfs page it might be able to discard (possibly the
         one it's trying to write out).
    
     (7) The netfs is called to throw the page away (nfs_release_page()) - but it's
         called with __GFP_WAIT, so the netfs decides to wait for the store to
         complete (__fscache_wait_on_page_write()).
    
     (8) This blocks a slow-work processing thread - possibly against itself.
    
    The system ends up stuck because it can't write out any netfs pages to the
    cache without allocating more memory.
    
    To avoid this, we make FS-Cache cancel some writes that aren't in the middle of
    actually being performed.  This means that some data won't make it into the
    cache this time.  To support this, a new FS-Cache function is added
    fscache_maybe_release_page() that replaces what the netfs releasepage()
    functions used to do with respect to the cache.
    
    The decisions fscache_maybe_release_page() makes are counted and displayed
    through /proc/fs/fscache/stats on a line labelled "VmScan".  There are four
    counters provided: "nos=N" - pages that weren't pending storage; "gon=N" -
    pages that were pending storage when we first looked, but weren't by the time
    we got the object lock; "bsy=N" - pages that we ignored as they were actively
    being written when we looked; and "can=N" - pages that we cancelled the storage
    of.
    
    What I'd really like to do is alter the behaviour of the cancellation
    heuristics, depending on how necessary it is to expel pages.  If there are
    plenty of other pages that aren't waiting to be written to the cache that
    could be ejected first, then it would be nice to hold up on immediate
    cancellation of cache writes - but I don't see a way of doing that.
    Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
    201a1542
internal.h 11.8 KB