Marek reported a LOCKDEP issue occurring on 32bit host,
that we tracked down to the fact that usbnet could either
run from soft or hard irqs.

This patch adds u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave() and
u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore() helpers to solve this case.

[   17.768040] ================================
[   17.772239] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[   17.776511] 4.16.0-rc3-next-20180227-00007-g876c53a7493c #453 Not tainted
[   17.783329] --------------------------------
[   17.787580] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[   17.793607] swapper/0/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[   17.798751]  (&syncp->seq#5){?.-.}, at: [<9b22e5f0>]
asix_rx_fixup_internal+0x188/0x288
[   17.806790] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[   17.811677]   tx_complete+0x100/0x208
[   17.815319]   __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x60/0xf0
[   17.819770]   xhci_giveback_urb_in_irq+0xa8/0x240
[   17.824469]   xhci_td_cleanup+0xf4/0x16c
[   17.828367]   xhci_irq+0xe74/0x2240
[   17.831827]   usb_hcd_irq+0x24/0x38
[   17.835343]   __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x98/0x510
[   17.840111]   handle_irq_event_percpu+0x1c/0x58
[   17.844623]   handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c
[   17.848519]   handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x138
[   17.852681]   generic_handle_irq+0x18/0x28
[   17.856760]   __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xe4
[   17.860941]   gic_handle_irq+0x54/0xa0
[   17.864666]   __irq_svc+0x70/0xb0
[   17.867964]   arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c
[   17.871578]   arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c
[   17.875190]   do_idle+0x144/0x218
[   17.878468]   cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c
[   17.882454]   start_kernel+0x394/0x400
[   17.886177] irq event stamp: 161912
[   17.889616] hardirqs last  enabled at (161912): [<7bedfacf>]
__netdev_alloc_skb+0xcc/0x140
[   17.897893] hardirqs last disabled at (161911): [<d58261d0>]
__netdev_alloc_skb+0x94/0x140
[   17.904903] exynos5-hsi2c 12ca0000.i2c: tx timeout
[   17.906116] softirqs last  enabled at (161904): [<387102ff>]
irq_enter+0x78/0x80
[   17.906123] softirqs last disabled at (161905): [<cf4c628e>]
irq_exit+0x134/0x158
[   17.925722].
[   17.925722] other info that might help us debug this:
[   17.933435]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   17.933435].
[   17.940331]        CPU0
[   17.942488]        ----
[   17.944894]   lock(&syncp->seq#5);
[   17.948274]   <Interrupt>
[   17.950847]     lock(&syncp->seq#5);
[   17.954386].
[   17.954386]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   17.954386].
[   17.962422] no locks held by swapper/0/0.

Fixes: c8b5d129 ("net: usbnet: support 64bit stats")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>