-
Gustavo Padovan authored
sco_chan_del() only has conn != NULL when called from sco_conn_del() so just move the code from it that deal with conn to sco_conn_del(). [ 120.765529] [ 120.765529] ====================================================== [ 120.766529] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 120.766529] 3.5.0-rc1-10292-g3701f944-dirty #70 Tainted: G W [ 120.766529] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 120.766529] kworker/u:3/1497 is trying to acquire lock: [ 120.766529] (&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00b7ecc>] sco_chan_del+0x4c/0x170 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] but task is already holding lock: [ 120.766529] (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00b8401>] sco_conn_del+0x61/0xe0 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}: [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8107980e>] lock_acquire+0x8e/0xb0 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c19e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b85e9>] sco_connect_cfm+0x79/0x300 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa0094b13>] hci_sync_conn_complete_evt.isra.90+0x343/0x400 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa009d447>] hci_event_packet+0x317/0xfb0 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa008aa68>] hci_rx_work+0x2c8/0x890 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff81047db7>] process_one_work+0x197/0x460 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff810489d6>] worker_thread+0x126/0x2d0 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8104ee4d>] kthread+0x9d/0xb0 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c4294>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2){+.+...}: [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff81078a8a>] __lock_acquire+0x154a/0x1d30 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8107980e>] lock_acquire+0x8e/0xb0 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c19e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b7ecc>] sco_chan_del+0x4c/0x170 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b8414>] sco_conn_del+0x74/0xe0 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa00b88a2>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x32/0x60 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa0093a82>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.53+0x242/0x390 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa009d747>] hci_event_packet+0x617/0xfb0 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffffa008aa68>] hci_rx_work+0x2c8/0x890 [bluetooth] [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff81047db7>] process_one_work+0x197/0x460 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff810489d6>] worker_thread+0x126/0x2d0 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff8104ee4d>] kthread+0x9d/0xb0 [ 120.766529] [<ffffffff813c4294>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] other info that might help us debug this: [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] CPU0 CPU1 [ 120.766529] ---- ---- [ 120.766529] lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); [ 120.766529] lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2); [ 120.766529] lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); [ 120.766529] lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock#2); [ 120.766529] [ 120.766529] *** DEADLOCK *** Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
269c4845