-
Aneesh Kumar K.V authored
We cannot use the pte value used in set_pte_at for pte_same comparison, because archs like ppc64, filter/add new pte flag in set_pte_at. Instead fetch the pte value inside hugetlb_cow. We are comparing pte value to make sure the pte didn't change since we dropped the page table lock. hugetlb_cow get called with page table lock held, and we can take a copy of the pte value before we drop the page table lock. With hugetlbfs, we optimize the MAP_PRIVATE write fault path with no previous mapping (huge_pte_none entries), by forcing a cow in the fault path. This avoid take an addition fault to covert a read-only mapping to read/write. Here we were comparing a recently instantiated pte (via set_pte_at) to the pte values from linux page table. As explained above on ppc64 such pte_same check returned wrong result, resulting in us taking an additional fault on ppc64. Fixes: 6a119eae ("powerpc/mm: Add a _PAGE_PTE bit") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161018154245.18023-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
3999f52e