-
Bart Van Assche authored
Avoid that running test nvme/012 from the blktests suite triggers the following false positive lockdep complaint: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.0.0-rc3-xfstests-00015-g1236f7d60242 #841 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- ksoftirqd/1/16 is trying to acquire lock: 000000000282032e (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0 but task is already holding lock: 00000000cbadcbc2 (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock); lock(&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/16: #0: 00000000cbadcbc2 (&(&fq->mq_flush_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-xfstests-00015-g1236f7d60242 #841 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x90 __lock_acquire.cold.45+0x2b4/0x313 lock_acquire+0x98/0x160 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 flush_end_io+0x4e/0x1d0 blk_mq_complete_request+0x76/0x110 nvmet_req_complete+0x15/0x110 [nvmet] nvmet_bio_done+0x27/0x50 [nvmet] blk_update_request+0xd7/0x2d0 blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x100 blk_flush_complete_seq+0xe5/0x350 flush_end_io+0x12f/0x1d0 blk_done_softirq+0x9f/0xd0 __do_softirq+0xca/0x440 run_ksoftirqd+0x24/0x50 smpboot_thread_fn+0x113/0x1e0 kthread+0x121/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
b3c6a599