-
Kees Cook authored
The value resulting from the SECCOMP_RET_DATA mask could exceed MAX_ERRNO when setting errno during a SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO filter action. This makes sure we have a reliable value being set, so that an invalid errno will not be ignored by userspace. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
580c57f1