-
Luis R. Rodriguez authored
There's no need to require an ifdef over the declaration of sig_enforce as IS_ENABLED() can be used. While at it, there's no harm in exposing this kernel parameter outside of CONFIG_MODULE_SIG as it'd be a no-op on non module sig kernels. Now, technically we should in theory be able to remove the #ifdef'ery over the declaration of the module parameter as we are also trusting the bool_enable_only code for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG kernels but for now remain paranoid and keep it. With time if no one can put a bullet through bool_enable_only and if there are no technical requirements over not exposing CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE with the measures in place by bool_enable_only we could remove this last ifdef. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
6727bb9c