-
Peter Zijlstra authored
This patch collapses the two 'hard' cases, which are perf_event_{dis,en}able(). I cannot seem to convince myself the current code is correct. So starting with perf_event_disable(); we don't strictly need to test for event->state == ACTIVE, ctx->is_active is enough. If the event is not scheduled while the ctx is, __perf_event_disable() still does the right thing. Its a little less efficient to IPI in that case, over-all simpler. For perf_event_enable(); the same goes, but I think that's actually broken in its current form. The current condition is: ctx->is_active && event->state == OFF, that means it doesn't do anything when !ctx->active && event->state == OFF. This is wrong, it should still mark the event INACTIVE in that case, otherwise we'll still not try and schedule the event once the context becomes active again. This patch implements the two function using the new event_function_call() and does away with the tricky event->state tests. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
7b648018