> it87 and via686a violate the sysfs standard by having "alarm" instead
> of "alarms", would you please fix in your next patch?

I'm not the only one allowed to send patches to Greg, you know ;)
Anyway, here we go. Greg, here is a patch that corrects the standard
violation reported by Mark. Tested to compile.

(It also removes a useless comment in it87.c.)