-
Hangbin Liu authored
Based on RFC3376 5.1 and RFC3810 6.1 If the per-interface listening change that triggers the new report is a filter mode change, then the next [Robustness Variable] State Change Reports will include a Filter Mode Change Record. This applies even if any number of source list changes occur in that period. Old State New State State Change Record Sent --------- --------- ------------------------ INCLUDE (A) EXCLUDE (B) TO_EX (B) EXCLUDE (A) INCLUDE (B) TO_IN (B) So we should not send source-list change if there is a filter-mode change. Here are two scenarios: 1. Group deleted and filter mode is EXCLUDE, which means we need send a TO_IN { }. 2. Not group deleted, but has pcm->crcount, which means we need send a normal filter-mode-change. At the same time, if the type is ALLOW or BLOCK, and have psf->sf_crcount, we stop add records and decrease sf_crcount directly Reference: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma/current/msg01274.htmlSigned-off-by:
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
a052517a