Seccomp wants to know the syscall bitness, not the caller task bitness,
when it selects the syscall whitelist.

As far as I know, this makes no difference on any architecture, so it's
not a security problem.  (It generates identical code everywhere except
sparc, and, on sparc, the syscall numbering is the same for both ABIs.)
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>