On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:23:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
>>Yeah well...  in the intervening time, somebody on IRC commented
>>
>>"so what is so PCI-specific about those constants?"
>>
>>They probably ought to be DMA_{32,64}BIT_MASK or somesuch.

Here's an updated patch, applies to 2.6.5-rc2-bk9.
I left the DMA_xxBIT_MASK defines in linux/pci.h, although
they aren't necessarily PCI-specific.  Would we prefer to
have them in linux/dma-mapping.h ?