Commit 01215d3e authored by zhangyi (F)'s avatar zhangyi (F) Committed by Theodore Ts'o

jbd2: fix compile warning when using JBUFFER_TRACE

The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the
compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them.

In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_get_undo_access’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^
Signed-off-by: default avatarzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent 7159a986
...@@ -1252,11 +1252,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_undo_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) ...@@ -1252,11 +1252,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_undo_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
struct journal_head *jh; struct journal_head *jh;
char *committed_data = NULL; char *committed_data = NULL;
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
if (jbd2_write_access_granted(handle, bh, true)) if (jbd2_write_access_granted(handle, bh, true))
return 0; return 0;
jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(bh); jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(bh);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
/* /*
* Do this first --- it can drop the journal lock, so we want to * Do this first --- it can drop the journal lock, so we want to
* make sure that obtaining the committed_data is done * make sure that obtaining the committed_data is done
...@@ -1367,15 +1368,17 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) ...@@ -1367,15 +1368,17 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
return -EROFS; return -EROFS;
if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) { if (!buffer_jbd(bh))
ret = -EUCLEAN; return -EUCLEAN;
goto out;
}
/* /*
* We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part
* of the running transaction. * of the running transaction.
*/ */
jh = bh2jh(bh); jh = bh2jh(bh);
jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
/* /*
* This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh * This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh
* in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is * in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is
...@@ -1409,9 +1412,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) ...@@ -1409,9 +1412,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
} }
journal = transaction->t_journal; journal = transaction->t_journal;
jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
jbd_lock_bh_state(bh); jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
if (jh->b_modified == 0) { if (jh->b_modified == 0) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment