Commit 02d97831 authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] atomisp: Fix -Werror=int-in-bool-context compile errors

With gcc-7.1.1 I was getting the following compile error:

error: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead

The problem is the definition of CEIL_DIV:
 #define CEIL_DIV(a, b)       ((b) ? ((a) + (b) - 1) / (b) : 0)

Which when called as: CEIL_DIV(x, y * z) triggers this error, note
we cannot do as the error suggests since b is evaluated multiple times.

This commit fixes these compile errors.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
parent c2c611b7
......@@ -2506,7 +2506,6 @@ static void __configure_capture_pp_input(struct atomisp_sub_device *asd,
struct ia_css_pipe_extra_config *pipe_extra_configs =
&stream_env->pipe_extra_configs[pipe_id];
unsigned int hor_ds_factor = 0, ver_ds_factor = 0;
#define CEIL_DIV(a, b) ((b) ? ((a) + (b) - 1) / (b) : 0)
if (width == 0 && height == 0)
return;
......
......@@ -62,15 +62,15 @@
#define MAX(a, b) (((a) > (b)) ? (a) : (b))
#define MIN(a, b) (((a) < (b)) ? (a) : (b))
#ifdef ISP2401
#define ROUND_DIV(a, b) ((b) ? ((a) + ((b) >> 1)) / (b) : 0)
#define ROUND_DIV(a, b) (((b) != 0) ? ((a) + ((b) >> 1)) / (b) : 0)
#endif
#define CEIL_DIV(a, b) ((b) ? ((a) + (b) - 1) / (b) : 0)
#define CEIL_DIV(a, b) (((b) != 0) ? ((a) + (b) - 1) / (b) : 0)
#define CEIL_MUL(a, b) (CEIL_DIV(a, b) * (b))
#define CEIL_MUL2(a, b) (((a) + (b) - 1) & ~((b) - 1))
#define CEIL_SHIFT(a, b) (((a) + (1 << (b)) - 1)>>(b))
#define CEIL_SHIFT_MUL(a, b) (CEIL_SHIFT(a, b) << (b))
#ifdef ISP2401
#define ROUND_HALF_DOWN_DIV(a, b) ((b) ? ((a) + (b / 2) - 1) / (b) : 0)
#define ROUND_HALF_DOWN_DIV(a, b) (((b) != 0) ? ((a) + (b / 2) - 1) / (b) : 0)
#define ROUND_HALF_DOWN_MUL(a, b) (ROUND_HALF_DOWN_DIV(a, b) * (b))
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment