Commit 03319ec8 authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

sched: documentation, whitespace fixes

whitespace fixes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 78f2c7db
...@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct task_group { ...@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct task_group {
* *
* Bw(A) = 1000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 16.66% * Bw(A) = 1000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 16.66%
* Bw(B) = 2000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 33.33% * Bw(B) = 2000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 33.33%
* Bw(C) = 3000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 50% * Bw(C) = 3000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 50%
* *
* The weight assigned to a task group's schedulable entities on every * The weight assigned to a task group's schedulable entities on every
* cpu (task_group.se[a_cpu]->load.weight) is derived from the task * cpu (task_group.se[a_cpu]->load.weight) is derived from the task
...@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ struct task_group { ...@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ struct task_group {
* tg_A->se[0]->load.weight = tg_A->se[1]->load.weight = 1000; * tg_A->se[0]->load.weight = tg_A->se[1]->load.weight = 1000;
* *
* Note: It's not necessary that each of a task's group schedulable * Note: It's not necessary that each of a task's group schedulable
* entity have the same weight on all CPUs. If the group * entity have the same weight on all CPUs. If the group
* has 2 of its tasks on CPU0 and 1 task on CPU1, then a * has 2 of its tasks on CPU0 and 1 task on CPU1, then a
* better distribution of weight could be: * better distribution of weight could be:
* *
* tg_A->se[0]->load.weight = 2/3 * 2000 = 1333 * tg_A->se[0]->load.weight = 2/3 * 2000 = 1333
* tg_A->se[1]->load.weight = 1/2 * 2000 = 667 * tg_A->se[1]->load.weight = 1/2 * 2000 = 667
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment