Commit 0488a564 authored by Eric Yang's avatar Eric Yang Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/amd/display: fix mpcc assert condition

[Why]
In DCN2x asic, the MPCC status register definition changed, and
our logic for assert is incorrect. disabled is valid state,
where we should see idle and not busy, where as in not
disabled state, we should see not idle.

[How]
Change assert condition to be more sensible.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Yang <Eric.Yang2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarYongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Acked-by: default avatarLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent dcbb45b6
......@@ -446,23 +446,22 @@ void mpc2_assert_mpcc_idle_before_connect(struct mpc *mpc, int mpcc_id)
{
struct dcn20_mpc *mpc20 = TO_DCN20_MPC(mpc);
unsigned int top_sel, mpc_busy, mpc_idle, mpc_disabled;
REG_GET(MPCC_STATUS[mpcc_id], MPCC_DISABLED, &mpc_disabled);
if (mpc_disabled) {
ASSERT(0);
return;
}
REG_GET(MPCC_TOP_SEL[mpcc_id],
MPCC_TOP_SEL, &top_sel);
if (top_sel == 0xf) {
REG_GET_2(MPCC_STATUS[mpcc_id],
MPCC_BUSY, &mpc_busy,
MPCC_IDLE, &mpc_idle);
REG_GET_3(MPCC_STATUS[mpcc_id],
MPCC_BUSY, &mpc_busy,
MPCC_IDLE, &mpc_idle,
MPCC_DISABLED, &mpc_disabled);
ASSERT(mpc_busy == 0);
ASSERT(mpc_idle == 1);
if (top_sel == 0xf) {
ASSERT(!mpc_busy);
ASSERT(mpc_idle);
ASSERT(mpc_disabled);
} else {
ASSERT(!mpc_disabled);
ASSERT(!mpc_idle);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment