Commit 0995a5df authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

tracing: Provide lockdep less trace_hardirqs_on/off() variants

trace_hardirqs_on/off() is only partially safe vs. RCU idle. The tracer
core itself is safe, but the resulting tracepoints can be utilized by
e.g. BPF which is unsafe.

Provide variants which do not contain the lockdep invocation so the lockdep
and tracer invocations can be split at the call site and placed
properly. This is required because lockdep needs to be aware of the state
before switching away from RCU idle and after switching to RCU idle because
these transitions can take locks.

As these code pathes are going to be non-instrumentable the tracer can be
invoked after RCU is turned on and before the switch to RCU idle. So for
these new variants there is no need to invoke the rcuidle aware tracer
functions.

Name them so they match the lockdep counterparts.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.270771162@linutronix.de
parent 65538966
......@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
extern void trace_hardirqs_on_prepare(void);
extern void trace_hardirqs_off_prepare(void);
extern void trace_hardirqs_on(void);
extern void trace_hardirqs_off(void);
# define lockdep_hardirq_context(p) ((p)->hardirq_context)
......@@ -96,6 +98,8 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#else
# define trace_hardirqs_on_prepare() do { } while (0)
# define trace_hardirqs_off_prepare() do { } while (0)
# define trace_hardirqs_on() do { } while (0)
# define trace_hardirqs_off() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_hardirq_context(p) 0
......
......@@ -19,6 +19,24 @@
/* Per-cpu variable to prevent redundant calls when IRQs already off */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, tracing_irq_cpu);
/*
* Like trace_hardirqs_on() but without the lockdep invocation. This is
* used in the low level entry code where the ordering vs. RCU is important
* and lockdep uses a staged approach which splits the lockdep hardirq
* tracking into a RCU on and a RCU off section.
*/
void trace_hardirqs_on_prepare(void)
{
if (this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) {
if (!in_nmi())
trace_irq_enable(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
tracer_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 0);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_prepare);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_prepare);
void trace_hardirqs_on(void)
{
if (this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) {
......@@ -33,6 +51,25 @@ void trace_hardirqs_on(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on);
/*
* Like trace_hardirqs_off() but without the lockdep invocation. This is
* used in the low level entry code where the ordering vs. RCU is important
* and lockdep uses a staged approach which splits the lockdep hardirq
* tracking into a RCU on and a RCU off section.
*/
void trace_hardirqs_off_prepare(void)
{
if (!this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) {
this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 1);
tracer_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
if (!in_nmi())
trace_irq_disable(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off_prepare);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off_prepare);
void trace_hardirqs_off(void)
{
if (!this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment