Commit 0a1a86ac authored by Vitaly Kuznetsov's avatar Vitaly Kuznetsov Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Drivers: hv: hv_balloon: survive ballooning request with num_pages=0

... and simplify alloc_balloon_pages() interface by removing redundant
alloc_error from it.

If we happen to enter balloon_up() with balloon_wrk.num_pages = 0 we will enter
infinite 'while (!done)' loop as alloc_balloon_pages() will be always returning
0 and not setting alloc_error. We will also be sending a meaningless message to
the host on every iteration.

The 'alloc_unit == 1 && alloc_error -> num_ballooned == 0' change and
alloc_error elimination requires a special comment. We do alloc_balloon_pages()
with 2 different alloc_unit values and there are 4 different
alloc_balloon_pages() results, let's check them all.

alloc_unit = 512:
1) num_ballooned = 0, alloc_error = 0: we do 'alloc_unit=1' and retry pre- and
  post-patch.
2) num_ballooned > 0, alloc_error = 0: we check 'num_ballooned == num_pages'
  and act accordingly,  pre- and post-patch.
3) num_ballooned > 0, alloc_error > 0: we report this chunk and remain within
  the loop, no changes here.
4) num_ballooned = 0, alloc_error > 0: we do 'alloc_unit=1' and retry pre- and
  post-patch.

alloc_unit = 1:
1) num_ballooned = 0, alloc_error = 0: this can happen in two cases: when we
  passed 'num_pages=0' to alloc_balloon_pages() or when there was no space in
  bl_resp to place a single response. The second option is not possible as
  bl_resp is of PAGE_SIZE size and single response 'union dm_mem_page_range' is
  8 bytes, but the first one is (in theory, I think that Hyper-V host never
  places such requests). Pre-patch code loops forever, post-patch code sends
  a reply with more_pages = 0 and finishes.
2) num_ballooned > 0, alloc_error = 0: we ran out of space in bl_resp, we
  report partial success and remain within the loop, no changes pre- and
  post-patch.
3) num_ballooned > 0, alloc_error > 0: pre-patch code finishes, post-patch code
  does one more try and if there is no progress (we finish with
  'num_ballooned = 0') we finish. So we try a bit harder with this patch.
4) num_ballooned = 0, alloc_error > 0: both pre- and post-patch code enter
 'more_pages = 0' branch and finish.

So this patch has two real effects:
1) We reply with an empty response to 'num_pages=0' request.
2) We try a bit harder on alloc_unit=1 allocations (and reply with an empty
   tail reply in case we fail).

An empty reply should be supported by host as we were able to send it even with
pre-patch code when we were not able to allocate a single page.
Suggested-by: default avatarLaszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarK. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 7fb0e1a6
...@@ -1081,9 +1081,9 @@ static void free_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm, ...@@ -1081,9 +1081,9 @@ static void free_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm,
static int alloc_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm, int num_pages, static int alloc_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm, int num_pages,
struct dm_balloon_response *bl_resp, int alloc_unit, struct dm_balloon_response *bl_resp,
bool *alloc_error) int alloc_unit)
{ {
int i = 0; int i = 0;
struct page *pg; struct page *pg;
...@@ -1104,11 +1104,8 @@ static int alloc_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm, int num_pages, ...@@ -1104,11 +1104,8 @@ static int alloc_balloon_pages(struct hv_dynmem_device *dm, int num_pages,
__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN, __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN,
get_order(alloc_unit << PAGE_SHIFT)); get_order(alloc_unit << PAGE_SHIFT));
if (!pg) { if (!pg)
*alloc_error = true;
return i * alloc_unit; return i * alloc_unit;
}
dm->num_pages_ballooned += alloc_unit; dm->num_pages_ballooned += alloc_unit;
...@@ -1140,7 +1137,6 @@ static void balloon_up(struct work_struct *dummy) ...@@ -1140,7 +1137,6 @@ static void balloon_up(struct work_struct *dummy)
struct dm_balloon_response *bl_resp; struct dm_balloon_response *bl_resp;
int alloc_unit; int alloc_unit;
int ret; int ret;
bool alloc_error;
bool done = false; bool done = false;
int i; int i;
struct sysinfo val; struct sysinfo val;
...@@ -1173,18 +1169,15 @@ static void balloon_up(struct work_struct *dummy) ...@@ -1173,18 +1169,15 @@ static void balloon_up(struct work_struct *dummy)
num_pages -= num_ballooned; num_pages -= num_ballooned;
alloc_error = false;
num_ballooned = alloc_balloon_pages(&dm_device, num_pages, num_ballooned = alloc_balloon_pages(&dm_device, num_pages,
bl_resp, alloc_unit, bl_resp, alloc_unit);
&alloc_error);
if (alloc_unit != 1 && num_ballooned == 0) { if (alloc_unit != 1 && num_ballooned == 0) {
alloc_unit = 1; alloc_unit = 1;
continue; continue;
} }
if ((alloc_unit == 1 && alloc_error) || if (num_ballooned == 0 || num_ballooned == num_pages) {
(num_ballooned == num_pages)) {
bl_resp->more_pages = 0; bl_resp->more_pages = 0;
done = true; done = true;
dm_device.state = DM_INITIALIZED; dm_device.state = DM_INITIALIZED;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment