usb: gadget: composite: Test get_alt() presence instead of set_alt()

commit 7e4da3fc upstream.

By convention (according to doc) if function does not provide
get_alt() callback composite framework should assume that it has only
altsetting 0 and should respond with error if host tries to set
other one.

After commit dd4dff8b ("USB: composite: Fix bug: should test
set_alt function pointer before use it")
we started checking set_alt() callback instead of get_alt().
This check is useless as we check if set_alt() is set inside
usb_add_function() and fail if it's NULL.

Let's fix this check and move comment about why we check the get
method instead of set a little bit closer to prevent future false
fixes.

Fixes: dd4dff8b ("USB: composite: Fix bug: should test set_alt function pointer before use it")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c

@@ -1126,9 +1126,7 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
 		value = min(w_length, (u16) 1);
 		break;
 
-	/* function drivers must handle get/set altsetting; if there's
-	 * no get() method, we know only altsetting zero works.
-	 */
+	/* function drivers must handle get/set altsetting */
 	case USB_REQ_SET_INTERFACE:
 		if (ctrl->bRequestType != USB_RECIP_INTERFACE)
 			goto unknown;
@@ -1137,7 +1135,13 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
 		f = cdev->config->interface[intf];
 		if (!f)
 			break;
-		if (w_value && !f->set_alt)
+
+		/*
+		 * If there's no get_alt() method, we know only altsetting zero
+		 * works. There is no need to check if set_alt() is not NULL
+		 * as we check this in usb_add_function().
+		 */
+		if (w_value && !f->get_alt)
 			break;
 		value = f->set_alt(f, w_index, w_value);
 		if (value == USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS) {