Commit 12e09337 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

time: Prevent 32 bit overflow with set_normalized_timespec()

set_normalized_timespec() nsec argument is of type long. The recent
timekeeping changes of ktime_get_ts() feed 

	ts->tv_nsec + tomono.tv_nsec + nsecs

to set_normalized_timespec(). On 32 bit machines that sum can be
larger than (1 << 31) and therefor result in a negative value which
screws up the result completely.

Make the nsec argument of set_normalized_timespec() s64 to fix the
problem at hand. This also prevents similar problems for future users
of set_normalized_timespec().
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: default avatarCarsten Emde <carsten.emde@osadl.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
parent 54a6bc0b
......@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ extern unsigned long mktime(const unsigned int year, const unsigned int mon,
const unsigned int day, const unsigned int hour,
const unsigned int min, const unsigned int sec);
extern void set_normalized_timespec(struct timespec *ts, time_t sec, long nsec);
extern void set_normalized_timespec(struct timespec *ts, time_t sec, s64 nsec);
extern struct timespec timespec_add_safe(const struct timespec lhs,
const struct timespec rhs);
......
......@@ -370,13 +370,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mktime);
* 0 <= tv_nsec < NSEC_PER_SEC
* For negative values only the tv_sec field is negative !
*/
void set_normalized_timespec(struct timespec *ts, time_t sec, long nsec)
void set_normalized_timespec(struct timespec *ts, time_t sec, s64 nsec)
{
while (nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
/*
* The following asm() prevents the compiler from
* optimising this loop into a modulo operation. See
* also __iter_div_u64_rem() in include/linux/time.h
*/
asm("" : "+rm"(nsec));
nsec -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
++sec;
}
while (nsec < 0) {
asm("" : "+rm"(nsec));
nsec += NSEC_PER_SEC;
--sec;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment