Commit 12fd3520 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] nfsd: lockdep annotation

while doing a kernel make modules_install install over an NFS mount.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  ---------------------------------------------
  nfsd/9550 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c034c845>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c034c845>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by nfsd/9550:
   #0:  (hash_sem){..--}, at: [<cc895223>] exp_readlock+0xd/0xf [nfsd]
   #1:  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c034c845>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

  stack backtrace:
   [<c0103508>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x152
   [<c0103b8b>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c0103c2f>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c012aa57>] __lock_acquire+0x77a/0x9a3
   [<c012af4a>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
   [<c034c6c2>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa7/0x20e
   [<c034c845>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
   [<c0162edc>] vfs_unlink+0x34/0x8a
   [<cc891d98>] nfsd_unlink+0x18f/0x1e2 [nfsd]
   [<cc89884f>] nfsd3_proc_remove+0x95/0xa2 [nfsd]
   [<cc88f0d4>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc0/0x178 [nfsd]
   [<c033e84d>] svc_process+0x3a5/0x5ed
   [<cc88f5ba>] nfsd+0x1a7/0x305 [nfsd]
   [<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
  DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
  Leftover inexact backtrace:
   [<c0103b8b>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c0103c2f>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c012aa57>] __lock_acquire+0x77a/0x9a3
   [<c012af4a>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
   [<c034c6c2>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa7/0x20e
   [<c034c845>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
   [<c0162edc>] vfs_unlink+0x34/0x8a
   [<cc891d98>] nfsd_unlink+0x18f/0x1e2 [nfsd]
   [<cc89884f>] nfsd3_proc_remove+0x95/0xa2 [nfsd]
   [<cc88f0d4>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc0/0x178 [nfsd]
   [<c033e84d>] svc_process+0x3a5/0x5ed
   [<cc88f5ba>] nfsd+0x1a7/0x305 [nfsd]
   [<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  ---------------------------------------------
  nfsd/9580 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c034cc1d>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c034cc1d>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by nfsd/9580:
   #0:  (hash_sem){..--}, at: [<cc89522b>] exp_readlock+0xd/0xf [nfsd]
   #1:  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c034cc1d>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f

  stack backtrace:
   [<c0103508>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x152
   [<c0103b8b>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c0103c2f>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c012aa63>] __lock_acquire+0x77a/0x9a3
   [<c012af56>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
   [<c034ca9a>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa7/0x20e
   [<c034cc1d>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
   [<cc892ad1>] nfsd_setattr+0x2c8/0x499 [nfsd]
   [<cc893ede>] nfsd_create_v3+0x31b/0x4ac [nfsd]
   [<cc8984a1>] nfsd3_proc_create+0x128/0x138 [nfsd]
   [<cc88f0d4>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc0/0x178 [nfsd]
   [<c033ec1d>] svc_process+0x3a5/0x5ed
   [<cc88f5ba>] nfsd+0x1a7/0x305 [nfsd]
   [<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
  DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
  Leftover inexact backtrace:
   [<c0103b8b>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c0103c2f>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c012aa63>] __lock_acquire+0x77a/0x9a3
   [<c012af56>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
   [<c034ca9a>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa7/0x20e
   [<c034cc1d>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
   [<cc892ad1>] nfsd_setattr+0x2c8/0x499 [nfsd]
   [<cc893ede>] nfsd_create_v3+0x31b/0x4ac [nfsd]
   [<cc8984a1>] nfsd3_proc_create+0x128/0x138 [nfsd]
   [<cc88f0d4>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc0/0x178 [nfsd]
   [<c033ec1d>] svc_process+0x3a5/0x5ed
   [<cc88f5ba>] nfsd+0x1a7/0x305 [nfsd]
   [<c0101005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent eed2965a
...@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ nfsd_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, ...@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ nfsd_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
*/ */
if (!resfhp->fh_dentry) { if (!resfhp->fh_dentry) {
/* called from nfsd_proc_mkdir, or possibly nfsd3_proc_create */ /* called from nfsd_proc_mkdir, or possibly nfsd3_proc_create */
fh_lock(fhp); fh_lock_nested(fhp, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
dchild = lookup_one_len(fname, dentry, flen); dchild = lookup_one_len(fname, dentry, flen);
err = PTR_ERR(dchild); err = PTR_ERR(dchild);
if (IS_ERR(dchild)) if (IS_ERR(dchild))
...@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, ...@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
err = nfserr_notdir; err = nfserr_notdir;
if(!dirp->i_op || !dirp->i_op->lookup) if(!dirp->i_op || !dirp->i_op->lookup)
goto out; goto out;
fh_lock(fhp); fh_lock_nested(fhp, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
/* /*
* Compose the response file handle. * Compose the response file handle.
...@@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ nfsd_link(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, ...@@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ nfsd_link(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp,
if (isdotent(name, len)) if (isdotent(name, len))
goto out; goto out;
fh_lock(ffhp); fh_lock_nested(ffhp, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
ddir = ffhp->fh_dentry; ddir = ffhp->fh_dentry;
dirp = ddir->d_inode; dirp = ddir->d_inode;
...@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ nfsd_unlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, int type, ...@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ nfsd_unlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, int type,
if (err) if (err)
goto out; goto out;
fh_lock(fhp); fh_lock_nested(fhp, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
dentry = fhp->fh_dentry; dentry = fhp->fh_dentry;
dirp = dentry->d_inode; dirp = dentry->d_inode;
......
...@@ -290,8 +290,9 @@ fill_post_wcc(struct svc_fh *fhp) ...@@ -290,8 +290,9 @@ fill_post_wcc(struct svc_fh *fhp)
* vfs.c:nfsd_rename as it needs to grab 2 i_mutex's at once * vfs.c:nfsd_rename as it needs to grab 2 i_mutex's at once
* so, any changes here should be reflected there. * so, any changes here should be reflected there.
*/ */
static inline void static inline void
fh_lock(struct svc_fh *fhp) fh_lock_nested(struct svc_fh *fhp, unsigned int subclass)
{ {
struct dentry *dentry = fhp->fh_dentry; struct dentry *dentry = fhp->fh_dentry;
struct inode *inode; struct inode *inode;
...@@ -310,11 +311,17 @@ fh_lock(struct svc_fh *fhp) ...@@ -310,11 +311,17 @@ fh_lock(struct svc_fh *fhp)
} }
inode = dentry->d_inode; inode = dentry->d_inode;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); mutex_lock_nested(&inode->i_mutex, subclass);
fill_pre_wcc(fhp); fill_pre_wcc(fhp);
fhp->fh_locked = 1; fhp->fh_locked = 1;
} }
static inline void
fh_lock(struct svc_fh *fhp)
{
fh_lock_nested(fhp, I_MUTEX_NORMAL);
}
/* /*
* Unlock a file handle/inode * Unlock a file handle/inode
*/ */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment