Commit 136b5721 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: deprecate __cancel_delayed_work()

Now that cancel_delayed_work() can be safely called from IRQ handlers,
there's no reason to use __cancel_delayed_work().  Use
cancel_delayed_work() instead of __cancel_delayed_work() and mark the
latter deprecated.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
parent 57b30ae7
......@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_start_queue);
**/
void blk_stop_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
__cancel_delayed_work(&q->delay_work);
cancel_delayed_work(&q->delay_work);
queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, q);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_stop_queue);
......
......@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static void unlock_fdc(void)
raw_cmd = NULL;
command_status = FD_COMMAND_NONE;
__cancel_delayed_work(&fd_timeout);
cancel_delayed_work(&fd_timeout);
do_floppy = NULL;
cont = NULL;
clear_bit(0, &fdc_busy);
......
......@@ -2004,7 +2004,7 @@ static void adjust_timeout(struct ib_mad_agent_private *mad_agent_priv)
unsigned long delay;
if (list_empty(&mad_agent_priv->wait_list)) {
__cancel_delayed_work(&mad_agent_priv->timed_work);
cancel_delayed_work(&mad_agent_priv->timed_work);
} else {
mad_send_wr = list_entry(mad_agent_priv->wait_list.next,
struct ib_mad_send_wr_private,
......
......@@ -4306,7 +4306,7 @@ static void dsi_framedone_irq_callback(void *data, u32 mask)
* and is sending the data.
*/
__cancel_delayed_work(&dsi->framedone_timeout_work);
cancel_delayed_work(&dsi->framedone_timeout_work);
dsi_handle_framedone(dsidev, 0);
}
......
......@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ extern unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work);
* if it returns 0 the timer function may be running and the queueing is in
* progress.
*/
static inline bool __cancel_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *work)
static inline bool __deprecated __cancel_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *work)
{
bool ret;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment