Commit 14c9b31a authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf header: Fix lock/unlock imbalances when processing BPF/BTF info

Fix lock/unlock imbalances by refactoring the code a bit and adding
calls to up_write() before return.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1444315 ("Missing unlock")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1444316 ("Missing unlock")
Fixes: a70a1123 ("perf bpf: Save BTF information as headers to perf.data")
Fixes: 606f972b ("perf bpf: Save bpf_prog_info information as headers to perf.data")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190408173355.GA10501@embeddedor
[ Simplified the exit path to have just one up_write() + return ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 9d5dcc93
...@@ -2606,6 +2606,7 @@ static int process_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) ...@@ -2606,6 +2606,7 @@ static int process_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node); perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node);
} }
up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
return 0; return 0;
out: out:
free(info_linear); free(info_linear);
...@@ -2623,7 +2624,9 @@ static int process_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff __maybe_unused, void *data _ ...@@ -2623,7 +2624,9 @@ static int process_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff __maybe_unused, void *data _
static int process_bpf_btf(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) static int process_bpf_btf(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
{ {
struct perf_env *env = &ff->ph->env; struct perf_env *env = &ff->ph->env;
struct btf_node *node = NULL;
u32 count, i; u32 count, i;
int err = -1;
if (ff->ph->needs_swap) { if (ff->ph->needs_swap) {
pr_warning("interpreting btf from systems with endianity is not yet supported\n"); pr_warning("interpreting btf from systems with endianity is not yet supported\n");
...@@ -2636,31 +2639,32 @@ static int process_bpf_btf(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) ...@@ -2636,31 +2639,32 @@ static int process_bpf_btf(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
down_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); down_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) { for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
struct btf_node *node;
u32 id, data_size; u32 id, data_size;
if (do_read_u32(ff, &id)) if (do_read_u32(ff, &id))
return -1; goto out;
if (do_read_u32(ff, &data_size)) if (do_read_u32(ff, &data_size))
return -1; goto out;
node = malloc(sizeof(struct btf_node) + data_size); node = malloc(sizeof(struct btf_node) + data_size);
if (!node) if (!node)
return -1; goto out;
node->id = id; node->id = id;
node->data_size = data_size; node->data_size = data_size;
if (__do_read(ff, node->data, data_size)) { if (__do_read(ff, node->data, data_size))
free(node); goto out;
return -1;
}
perf_env__insert_btf(env, node); perf_env__insert_btf(env, node);
node = NULL;
} }
err = 0;
out:
up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
return 0; free(node);
return err;
} }
struct feature_ops { struct feature_ops {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment