Commit 1894df0c authored by Andre Guedes's avatar Andre Guedes Committed by Jeff Kirsher

igc: Fix NFC rule validation

If we try to overwrite an existing rule with the same filter but
different action, we get EEXIST error as shown below.

$ ethtool -N eth0 flow-type ether dst <MACADDR> action 1 loc 10
$ ethtool -N eth0 flow-type ether dst <MACADDR> action 2 loc 10
rmgr: Cannot insert RX class rule: File exists

The second command is expected to overwrite the previous rule in location
10 and succeed.

This patch fixes igc_ethtool_check_nfc_rule() so it also checks the
rules location. In case they match, the rule under evaluation should not
be considered invalid.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent e256ec83
......@@ -1225,8 +1225,8 @@ static void igc_ethtool_init_nfc_rule(struct igc_nfc_rule *rule,
* Rules with both destination and source MAC addresses are considered invalid
* since the driver doesn't support them.
*
* Also, if there is already another rule with the same filter, @rule is
* considered invalid.
* Also, if there is already another rule with the same filter in a different
* location, @rule is considered invalid.
*
* Context: Expects adapter->nfc_rule_lock to be held by caller.
*
......@@ -1252,7 +1252,8 @@ static int igc_ethtool_check_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &adapter->nfc_rule_list, list) {
if (!memcmp(&rule->filter, &tmp->filter,
sizeof(rule->filter))) {
sizeof(rule->filter)) &&
tmp->location != rule->location) {
netdev_dbg(dev, "Rule already exists\n");
return -EEXIST;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment