Commit 18dafac1 authored by Jiro SEKIBA's avatar Jiro SEKIBA Committed by Ryusuke Konishi

nilfs2: deleted inconsistent comment in nilfs_load_inode_block()

The comment says, "Caller of this function MUST lock s_inode_lock",
however just above the comment, it locks s_inode_lock in the function.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
parent 1a7af631
...@@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, ...@@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
int err; int err;
spin_lock(&sbi->s_inode_lock); spin_lock(&sbi->s_inode_lock);
/* Caller of this function MUST lock s_inode_lock */
if (ii->i_bh == NULL) { if (ii->i_bh == NULL) {
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_inode_lock); spin_unlock(&sbi->s_inode_lock);
err = nilfs_ifile_get_inode_block(sbi->s_ifile, inode->i_ino, err = nilfs_ifile_get_inode_block(sbi->s_ifile, inode->i_ino,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment