Commit 1b846f92 authored by Dan Carpenter's avatar Dan Carpenter Committed by David S. Miller

bridge: simplify br_getlink() a bit

Static checkers complain that we should maybe set "ret" before we do the
"goto out;".  They interpret the NULL return from br_port_get_rtnl() as
a failure and forgetting to set the error code is a common bug in this
situation.

The code is confusing but it's actually correct.  We are returning zero
deliberately.  Let's re-write it a bit to be more clear.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: default avatarStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 5c66cfe0
......@@ -311,17 +311,14 @@ void br_ifinfo_notify(int event, struct net_bridge_port *port)
int br_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
struct net_device *dev, u32 filter_mask)
{
int err = 0;
struct net_bridge_port *port = br_port_get_rtnl(dev);
if (!port && !(filter_mask & RTEXT_FILTER_BRVLAN) &&
!(filter_mask & RTEXT_FILTER_BRVLAN_COMPRESSED))
goto out;
return 0;
err = br_fill_ifinfo(skb, port, pid, seq, RTM_NEWLINK, NLM_F_MULTI,
filter_mask, dev);
out:
return err;
return br_fill_ifinfo(skb, port, pid, seq, RTM_NEWLINK, NLM_F_MULTI,
filter_mask, dev);
}
static int br_vlan_info(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment