Commit 248f0672 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

[AF_UNIX]: Test against sk_max_ack_backlog properly.

This brings things inline with the sk_acceptq_is_full() bug
fix.  The limit test should be x >= sk_max_ack_backlog.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8488df89
......@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static long unix_wait_for_peer(struct sock *other, long timeo)
sched = !sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD) &&
!(other->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) &&
(skb_queue_len(&other->sk_receive_queue) >
(skb_queue_len(&other->sk_receive_queue) >=
other->sk_max_ack_backlog);
unix_state_runlock(other);
......@@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
if (other->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
goto out_unlock;
if (skb_queue_len(&other->sk_receive_queue) >
if (skb_queue_len(&other->sk_receive_queue) >=
other->sk_max_ack_backlog) {
err = -EAGAIN;
if (!timeo)
......@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct socket *sock,
}
if (unix_peer(other) != sk &&
(skb_queue_len(&other->sk_receive_queue) >
(skb_queue_len(&other->sk_receive_queue) >=
other->sk_max_ack_backlog)) {
if (!timeo) {
err = -EAGAIN;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment