rbd: cancel lock_dwork if the wait is interrupted
There is a warning message in my test with below steps: # rbd bench --io-type write --io-size 4K --io-threads 1 --io-pattern rand test & # sleep 5 # pkill -9 rbd # rbd map test & # sleep 5 # pkill rbd The reason is that the rbd_add_acquire_lock() is interruptable, that means, when we kill the waiting on ->acquire_wait, the lock_dwork could be still running. 1. do_rbd_add() 2. lock_dwork rbd_add_acquire_lock() - queue_delayed_work() lock_dwork queued - wait_for_completion_killable_timeout() <-- kill happen rbd_dev_image_unlock() <-- UNLOCKED now, nothing to do. rbd_dev_device_release() rbd_dev_image_release() - ... lock successed here - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork) Then when we reach the rbd_dev_free(), WARN_ON is triggered because lock_state is not RBD_LOCK_STATE_UNLOCKED. To fix it, this commit make sure the lock_dwork was finished before calling rbd_dev_image_unlock(). On the other hand, this would not happend in do_rbd_remove(), because after rbd mapped, lock_dwork will only be queued for IO request, and request will continue unless lock_dwork finished. when we call rbd_dev_image_unlock() in do_rbd_remove(), all requests are done. That means, lock_state should not be locked again after rbd_dev_image_unlock(). [ Cancel lock_dwork in rbd_add_acquire_lock(), only if the wait is interrupted. ] Fixes: 637cd060 ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code") Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn> Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment