tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0
commit 399235dc upstream. Both for FIFO and CRB interface TCG has decided to use the same HID MSFT0101. They can be differentiated by looking at the start method from TPM2 ACPI table. This patches makes necessary fixes to tpm_tis and tpm_crb modules in order to correctly detect, which module should be used. For MSFT0101 we must use struct acpi_driver because struct pnp_driver has a 7 character limitation. It turned out that the root cause in b371616b was not correct for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98181. v2: * One fixup was missing from v1: is_tpm2_fifo -> is_fifo v3: * Use pnp_driver for existing HIDs and acpi_driver only for MSFT0101 in order ensure backwards compatibility. v4: * Check for FIFO before doing *anything* in crb_acpi_add(). * There was return immediately after acpi_bus_unregister_driver() in cleanup_tis(). This caused pnp_unregister_driver() not to be called. Reported-by: Michael Saunders <mick.saunders@gmail.com> Reported-by: Michael Marley <michael@michaelmarley.com> Reported-by: Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl> Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Marley <michael@michaelmarley.com> Tested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (on TPM 1.2) Reviewed-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment