Commit 2c2ca2d1 authored by Nadav Amit's avatar Nadav Amit Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: x86: Remove redundant and incorrect cpl check on task-switch

Task-switch emulation checks the privilege level prior to performing the
task-switch.  This check is incorrect in the case of task-gates, in which the
tss.dpl is ignored, and can cause superfluous exceptions.  Moreover this check
is unnecassary, since the CPU checks the privilege levels prior to exiting.
Intel SDM 25.4.2 says "If CALL or JMP accesses a TSS descriptor directly
outside IA-32e mode, privilege levels are checked on the TSS descriptor" prior
to exiting.  AMD 15.14.1 says "The intercept is checked before the task switch
takes place but after the incoming TSS and task gate (if one was involved) have
been checked for correctness."

This patch removes the CPL checks for CALL and JMP.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 9a9abf6b
...@@ -2824,7 +2824,8 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ...@@ -2824,7 +2824,8 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
* *
* 1. jmp/call/int to task gate: Check against DPL of the task gate * 1. jmp/call/int to task gate: Check against DPL of the task gate
* 2. Exception/IRQ/iret: No check is performed * 2. Exception/IRQ/iret: No check is performed
* 3. jmp/call to TSS: Check against DPL of the TSS * 3. jmp/call to TSS/task-gate: No check is performed since the
* hardware checks it before exiting.
*/ */
if (reason == TASK_SWITCH_GATE) { if (reason == TASK_SWITCH_GATE) {
if (idt_index != -1) { if (idt_index != -1) {
...@@ -2841,13 +2842,8 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ...@@ -2841,13 +2842,8 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
if ((tss_selector & 3) > dpl || ops->cpl(ctxt) > dpl) if ((tss_selector & 3) > dpl || ops->cpl(ctxt) > dpl)
return emulate_gp(ctxt, (idt_index << 3) | 0x2); return emulate_gp(ctxt, (idt_index << 3) | 0x2);
} }
} else if (reason != TASK_SWITCH_IRET) {
int dpl = next_tss_desc.dpl;
if ((tss_selector & 3) > dpl || ops->cpl(ctxt) > dpl)
return emulate_gp(ctxt, tss_selector);
} }
desc_limit = desc_limit_scaled(&next_tss_desc); desc_limit = desc_limit_scaled(&next_tss_desc);
if (!next_tss_desc.p || if (!next_tss_desc.p ||
((desc_limit < 0x67 && (next_tss_desc.type & 8)) || ((desc_limit < 0x67 && (next_tss_desc.type & 8)) ||
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment