Commit 2c2efaed authored by Yong Zhang's avatar Yong Zhang Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Kill WAKEUP_PREEMPT

Remove the WAKEUP_PREEMPT feature, disabling it doesn't make any sense
and its outlived its use by a long long while.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110729082033.GB12106@zhySigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent e2b245f8
......@@ -1095,9 +1095,6 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
* narrow margin doesn't have to wait for a full slice.
* This also mitigates buddy induced latencies under load.
*/
if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
return;
if (delta_exec < sysctl_sched_min_granularity)
return;
......@@ -1233,7 +1230,7 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
return;
#endif
if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1 || !sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1)
check_preempt_tick(cfs_rq, curr);
}
......@@ -1899,10 +1896,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
if (unlikely(p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL))
return;
if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
return;
find_matching_se(&se, &pse);
update_curr(cfs_rq_of(se));
BUG_ON(!pse);
......
......@@ -11,11 +11,6 @@ SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
*/
SCHED_FEAT(START_DEBIT, 1)
/*
* Should wakeups try to preempt running tasks.
*/
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPT, 1)
/*
* Based on load and program behaviour, see if it makes sense to place
* a newly woken task on the same cpu as the task that woke it --
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment