um: fix races between line_open() and line_config()
Pull parse_chan_pair() call into setup_one_line(), under the mutex. We really don't want open() to succeed before parse_chan_pair() had been done (or after it has failed, BTW). We also want "remove con<n>" to free irqs, etc., same as "config con<n>=none". Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment