Commit 31f3cadc authored by Stephen Smalley's avatar Stephen Smalley Committed by Ben Hutchings

selinux: fix inode security list corruption

commit 923190d3 upstream.

sb_finish_set_opts() can race with inode_free_security()
when initializing inode security structures for inodes
created prior to initial policy load or by the filesystem
during ->mount().   This appears to have always been
a possible race, but commit 3dc91d43 ("SELinux:  Fix possible
NULL pointer dereference in selinux_inode_permission()")
made it more evident by immediately reusing the unioned
list/rcu element  of the inode security structure for call_rcu()
upon an inode_free_security().  But the underlying issue
was already present before that commit as a possible use-after-free
of isec.

Shivnandan Kumar reported the list corruption and proposed
a patch to split the list and rcu elements out of the union
as separate fields of the inode_security_struct so that setting
the rcu element would not affect the list element.  However,
this would merely hide the issue and not truly fix the code.

This patch instead moves up the deletion of the list entry
prior to dropping the sbsec->isec_lock initially.  Then,
if the inode is dropped subsequently, there will be no further
references to the isec.
Reported-by: default avatarShivnandan Kumar <shivnandan.k@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
parent d2e594f2
......@@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ static int sb_finish_set_opts(struct super_block *sb)
list_entry(sbsec->isec_head.next,
struct inode_security_struct, list);
struct inode *inode = isec->inode;
list_del_init(&isec->list);
spin_unlock(&sbsec->isec_lock);
inode = igrab(inode);
if (inode) {
......@@ -443,7 +444,6 @@ static int sb_finish_set_opts(struct super_block *sb)
iput(inode);
}
spin_lock(&sbsec->isec_lock);
list_del_init(&isec->list);
goto next_inode;
}
spin_unlock(&sbsec->isec_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment