Commit 356a5c1c authored by Keith Owens's avatar Keith Owens Committed by Tony Luck

[IA64] ia64_wait_for_slaves() incorrectly reports MCA

ia64_wait_for_slaves() was changed in 2.6.17-rc1 to report the slave
state.  It incorrectly assumes that all slaves are for MCA, but
ia64_wait_for_slaves() is also called from the INIT monarch handler.
The existing message is very misleading, so correct it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKeith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
parent 907d91d7
......@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ ia64_mca_modify_original_stack(struct pt_regs *regs,
*/
static void
ia64_wait_for_slaves(int monarch)
ia64_wait_for_slaves(int monarch, const char *type)
{
int c, wait = 0, missing = 0;
for_each_online_cpu(c) {
......@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ ia64_wait_for_slaves(int monarch)
}
if (!missing)
goto all_in;
printk(KERN_INFO "OS MCA slave did not rendezvous on cpu");
printk(KERN_INFO "OS %s slave did not rendezvous on cpu", type);
for_each_online_cpu(c) {
if (c == monarch)
continue;
......@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ ia64_wait_for_slaves(int monarch)
return;
all_in:
printk(KERN_INFO "All OS MCA slaves have reached rendezvous\n");
printk(KERN_INFO "All OS %s slaves have reached rendezvous\n", type);
return;
}
......@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ ia64_mca_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, struct switch_stack *sw,
if (notify_die(DIE_MCA_MONARCH_ENTER, "MCA", regs, (long)&nd, 0, 0)
== NOTIFY_STOP)
ia64_mca_spin(__FUNCTION__);
ia64_wait_for_slaves(cpu);
ia64_wait_for_slaves(cpu, "MCA");
/* Wakeup all the processors which are spinning in the rendezvous loop.
* They will leave SAL, then spin in the OS with interrupts disabled
......@@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ ia64_init_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, struct switch_stack *sw,
*/
printk("Delaying for 5 seconds...\n");
udelay(5*1000000);
ia64_wait_for_slaves(cpu);
ia64_wait_for_slaves(cpu, "INIT");
/* If nobody intercepts DIE_INIT_MONARCH_PROCESS then we drop through
* to default_monarch_init_process() above and just print all the
* tasks.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment