RISC-V: Upgrade smp_mb__after_spinlock() to iorw,iorw
While digging through the recent mmiowb preemption issue it came up that
we aren't actually preventing IO from crossing a scheduling boundary.
While it's a bit ugly to overload smp_mb__after_spinlock() with this
behavior, it's what PowerPC is doing so there's some precedent.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment