Commit 3a57e783 authored by Rainer Weikusat's avatar Rainer Weikusat Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code

[ Upstream commit 3822b5c2 ]

With b3ca9b02, the AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM
receive code was changed from using mutex_lock(&u->readlock) to
mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock) to prevent signals from being
delayed for an indefinite time if a thread sleeping on the mutex
happened to be selected for handling the signal. But this was never a
problem with the stream receive code (as opposed to its datagram
counterpart) as that never went to sleep waiting for new messages with the
mutex held and thus, wouldn't cause secondary readers to block on the
mutex waiting for the sleeping primary reader. As the interruptible
locking makes the code more complicated in exchange for no benefit,
change it back to using mutex_lock.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
Acked-by: default avatarHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent aea23834
......@@ -1934,14 +1934,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
if (flags&MSG_OOB)
goto out;
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock);
if (unlikely(err)) {
/* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN
* sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
*/
err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS;
goto out;
}
mutex_lock(&u->readlock);
skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
......@@ -2133,12 +2126,12 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
timeo = unix_stream_data_wait(sk, timeo, last);
if (signal_pending(current)
|| mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock)) {
if (signal_pending(current)) {
err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
goto out;
}
mutex_lock(&u->readlock);
continue;
unlock:
unix_state_unlock(sk);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment