Commit 3a6f8e0c authored by Alex Xie's avatar Alex Xie Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/amdgpu: Add comment to describe the purpose of one difficult if statement

Use == instead of != in the if statement to make code easier understood
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 677131a1
......@@ -780,8 +780,13 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
next_pe_start = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(pt);
next_pe_start += (addr & mask) * 8;
if (cur_pe_end != next_pe_start) {
if (cur_pe_end == next_pe_start) {
/* The next ptb is consecutive to current ptb.
* Don't call amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes now.
* Will update two ptbs together in future.
*/
cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
} else {
amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes(adev, vm_update_params,
cur_pe_start, cur_pe_end,
cur_dst, flags);
......@@ -789,8 +794,6 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
cur_pe_start = next_pe_start;
cur_pe_end = next_pe_start + 8 * nptes;
cur_dst = dst;
} else {
cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
}
addr += nptes;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment