NET: mv643xx_eth: avoid lockdep dump on interface down
When the interface is shutdown, the mv643xx_eth driver hits the following lockdep dump: ================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 3.8.0+ #303 Not tainted --------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. NetworkManager/3449 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.?...}, at: [<c02828e4>] txq_reclaim+0x60/0x230 {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [<c007e93c>] mark_irqflags+0xf8/0x1c4 [<c007ee60>] __lock_acquire+0x458/0x9a4 [<c007f8b0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x74 [<c03ea914>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 [<c0334040>] sch_direct_xmit+0xa4/0x2e4 [<c0320880>] dev_queue_xmit+0x174/0x508 [<c03953b0>] ip6_finish_output2+0xd0/0x3c4 [<c03b15bc>] mld_sendpack+0x190/0x368 [<c03b3204>] mld_ifc_timer_expire+0xc/0x58 [<c005133c>] call_timer_fn+0x6c/0xe0 [<c0051588>] run_timer_softirq+0x1d8/0x210 [<c004c004>] __do_softirq+0xe0/0x1b4 [<c004c448>] irq_exit+0x64/0x6c [<c000f1e0>] handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84 [<c000e0d0>] __irq_usr+0x30/0x80 irq event stamp: 160603 hardirqs last enabled at (160603): [<c00c736c>] kfree+0xa8/0xe8 hardirqs last disabled at (160602): [<c00c72e0>] kfree+0x1c/0xe8 softirqs last enabled at (160304): [<c028260c>] mib_counters_update+0x5ec/0x60c softirqs last disabled at (160302): [<c03eab8c>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x14/0x54 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); <Interrupt> lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by NetworkManager/3449: #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c032e664>] rtnetlink_rcv+0xc/0x24 stack backtrace: [<c0013e34>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf8) from [<c007e12c>] (print_usage_bug+0x150/0x1d4) [<c007e12c>] (print_usage_bug+0x150/0x1d4) from [<c007e3f8>] (mark_lock_irq+0x248/0x290) [<c007e3f8>] (mark_lock_irq+0x248/0x290) from [<c007e598>] (mark_lock+0x158/0x404) [<c007e598>] (mark_lock+0x158/0x404) from [<c007e97c>] (mark_irqflags+0x138/0x1c4) [<c007e97c>] (mark_irqflags+0x138/0x1c4) from [<c007ee60>] (__lock_acquire+0x458/0x9a4) [<c007ee60>] (__lock_acquire+0x458/0x9a4) from [<c007f8b0>] (lock_acquire+0x60/0x74) [<c007f8b0>] (lock_acquire+0x60/0x74) from [<c03ea914>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50) [<c03ea914>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50) from [<c02828e4>] (txq_reclaim+0x60/0x230) [<c02828e4>] (txq_reclaim+0x60/0x230) from [<c0282ad8>] (txq_deinit+0x24/0xcc) [<c0282ad8>] (txq_deinit+0x24/0xcc) from [<c0282d28>] (mv643xx_eth_stop+0x1a8/0x1bc) [<c0282d28>] (mv643xx_eth_stop+0x1a8/0x1bc) from [<c031e314>] (__dev_close_many+0x88/0xcc) [<c031e314>] (__dev_close_many+0x88/0xcc) from [<c031e380>] (__dev_close+0x28/0x3c) [<c031e380>] (__dev_close+0x28/0x3c) from [<c0320fa0>] (__dev_change_flags+0x7c/0x134) [<c0320fa0>] (__dev_change_flags+0x7c/0x134) from [<c03210e0>] (dev_change_flags+0x10/0x48) [<c03210e0>] (dev_change_flags+0x10/0x48) from [<c032da1c>] (do_setlink+0x1a0/0x730) [<c032da1c>] (do_setlink+0x1a0/0x730) from [<c032f524>] (rtnl_newlink+0x304/0x4b0) [<c032f524>] (rtnl_newlink+0x304/0x4b0) from [<c032ef8c>] (rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x25c/0x2a0) [<c032ef8c>] (rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x25c/0x2a0) from [<c03383a0>] (netlink_rcv_skb+0xbc/0xd8) [<c03383a0>] (netlink_rcv_skb+0xbc/0xd8) from [<c032e674>] (rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x24) [<c032e674>] (rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x24) from [<c03361d8>] (netlink_unicast_kernel+0x88/0xd4) [<c03361d8>] (netlink_unicast_kernel+0x88/0xd4) from [<c0337dd0>] (netlink_unicast+0x138/0x180) [<c0337dd0>] (netlink_unicast+0x138/0x180) from [<c0338020>] (netlink_sendmsg+0x208/0x32c) [<c0338020>] (netlink_sendmsg+0x208/0x32c) from [<c030ab48>] (sock_sendmsg+0x84/0xa4) [<c030ab48>] (sock_sendmsg+0x84/0xa4) from [<c030aef4>] (__sys_sendmsg+0x2ac/0x2c4) [<c030aef4>] (__sys_sendmsg+0x2ac/0x2c4) from [<c030c8ec>] (sys_sendmsg+0x3c/0x68) [<c030c8ec>] (sys_sendmsg+0x3c/0x68) from [<c000e2e0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c) It seems that txq_reclaim() takes the netif tx lock: __netif_tx_lock(nq, smp_processor_id()); in a context outside of softirq context, and thus is susceptible to deadlock should an interrupt occur. Use __netif_tx_lock_bh()/__netif_tx_unlock_bh() instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment