Commit 3c24019d authored by Axel Lin's avatar Axel Lin Committed by Liam Girdwood

regulator: Fix off-by-one value range checking for mc13xxx_regulator_get_voltage

We use val as array index,
thus the valid value rangae for val should be 0 .. n_voltages-1.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
parent 6dc4efc6
...@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev) ...@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
dev_dbg(rdev_get_dev(rdev), "%s id: %d val: %d\n", __func__, id, val); dev_dbg(rdev_get_dev(rdev), "%s id: %d val: %d\n", __func__, id, val);
BUG_ON(val > mc13xxx_regulators[id].desc.n_voltages); BUG_ON(val >= mc13xxx_regulators[id].desc.n_voltages);
return mc13xxx_regulators[id].voltages[val]; return mc13xxx_regulators[id].voltages[val];
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment