Commit 3c6fe659 authored by Michał Mirosław's avatar Michał Mirosław Committed by Khalid Elmously

misc: atmel-ssc: lock with mutex instead of spinlock

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888690

commit b037d60a upstream.

Uninterruptible context is not needed in the driver and causes lockdep
warning because of mutex taken in of_alias_get_id(). Convert the lock to
mutex to avoid the issue.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 099343c6 ("ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add device tree support")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/50f0d7fa107f318296afb49477c3571e4d6978c5.1592998403.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.plSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKhalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
parent 062dc0d5
......@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/atmel-ssc.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
......@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
/* Serialize access to ssc_list and user count */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(user_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(user_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(ssc_list);
struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num)
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num)
int ssc_valid = 0;
struct ssc_device *ssc;
spin_lock(&user_lock);
mutex_lock(&user_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ssc, &ssc_list, list) {
if (ssc->pdev->dev.of_node) {
if (of_alias_get_id(ssc->pdev->dev.of_node, "ssc")
......@@ -44,18 +44,18 @@ struct ssc_device *ssc_request(unsigned int ssc_num)
}
if (!ssc_valid) {
spin_unlock(&user_lock);
mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
pr_err("ssc: ssc%d platform device is missing\n", ssc_num);
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
if (ssc->user) {
spin_unlock(&user_lock);
mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
dev_dbg(&ssc->pdev->dev, "module busy\n");
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
ssc->user++;
spin_unlock(&user_lock);
mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
clk_prepare(ssc->clk);
......@@ -67,14 +67,14 @@ void ssc_free(struct ssc_device *ssc)
{
bool disable_clk = true;
spin_lock(&user_lock);
mutex_lock(&user_lock);
if (ssc->user)
ssc->user--;
else {
disable_clk = false;
dev_dbg(&ssc->pdev->dev, "device already free\n");
}
spin_unlock(&user_lock);
mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
if (disable_clk)
clk_unprepare(ssc->clk);
......@@ -194,9 +194,9 @@ static int ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENXIO;
}
spin_lock(&user_lock);
mutex_lock(&user_lock);
list_add_tail(&ssc->list, &ssc_list);
spin_unlock(&user_lock);
mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ssc);
......@@ -210,9 +210,9 @@ static int ssc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ssc_device *ssc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
spin_lock(&user_lock);
mutex_lock(&user_lock);
list_del(&ssc->list);
spin_unlock(&user_lock);
mutex_unlock(&user_lock);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment