Commit 40a71660 authored by Vivien Didelot's avatar Vivien Didelot Committed by David S. Miller

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix fid_mask when leaving bridge

The mv88e6xxx_priv_state structure contains an fid_mask, where 1 means
the FID is free to use, 0 means the FID is in use.

This patch fixes the bit clear in mv88e6xxx_leave_bridge() when
assigning a new FID to a port.

Example scenario: I have 7 ports, port 5 is CPU, port 6 is unused (no
PHY). After setting the ports 0, 1 and 2 in bridge br0, and ports 3 and
4 in bridge br1, I have the following fid_mask: 0b111110010110 (0xf96).

Indeed, br0 uses FID 0, and br1 uses FID 3.

After setting nomaster for port 0, I get the wrong fid_mask: 0b10 (0x2).

With this patch we correctly get 0b111110010100 (0xf94), meaning port 0
uses FID 1, br0 uses FID 0, and br1 uses FID 3.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 75993300
...@@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ int mv88e6xxx_leave_bridge(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u32 br_port_mask) ...@@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ int mv88e6xxx_leave_bridge(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u32 br_port_mask)
newfid = __ffs(ps->fid_mask); newfid = __ffs(ps->fid_mask);
ps->fid[port] = newfid; ps->fid[port] = newfid;
ps->fid_mask &= (1 << newfid); ps->fid_mask &= ~(1 << newfid);
ps->bridge_mask[fid] &= ~(1 << port); ps->bridge_mask[fid] &= ~(1 << port);
ps->bridge_mask[newfid] = 1 << port; ps->bridge_mask[newfid] = 1 << port;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment