Commit 413d6100 authored by Colin Ian King's avatar Colin Ian King Committed by Steve French

cifs: fix spelling mistake, EACCESS -> EACCES

Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS,
rename to EACCES
Signed-off-by: default avatarColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
parent 0c5d6cb6
......@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
* Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns:
* 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server;
* 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server;
* 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
* 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
*/
static int
cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
......
......@@ -1320,8 +1320,8 @@ cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
/*
* If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry
* is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but
* if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS
* but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
* if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES
* but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
* unlink on negative dentries currently.
*/
int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment