Commit 42274bb2 authored by Pavel Shilovsky's avatar Pavel Shilovsky Committed by Steve French

CIFS: Fix DFS handling in cifs_get_file_info

We should call cifs_all_info_to_fattr in rc == 0 case only.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
parent a2d6b6ca
...@@ -562,7 +562,16 @@ int cifs_get_file_info(struct file *filp) ...@@ -562,7 +562,16 @@ int cifs_get_file_info(struct file *filp)
xid = GetXid(); xid = GetXid();
rc = CIFSSMBQFileInfo(xid, tcon, cfile->netfid, &find_data); rc = CIFSSMBQFileInfo(xid, tcon, cfile->netfid, &find_data);
if (rc == -EOPNOTSUPP || rc == -EINVAL) { switch (rc) {
case 0:
cifs_all_info_to_fattr(&fattr, &find_data, cifs_sb, false);
break;
case -EREMOTE:
cifs_create_dfs_fattr(&fattr, inode->i_sb);
rc = 0;
break;
case -EOPNOTSUPP:
case -EINVAL:
/* /*
* FIXME: legacy server -- fall back to path-based call? * FIXME: legacy server -- fall back to path-based call?
* for now, just skip revalidating and mark inode for * for now, just skip revalidating and mark inode for
...@@ -570,18 +579,14 @@ int cifs_get_file_info(struct file *filp) ...@@ -570,18 +579,14 @@ int cifs_get_file_info(struct file *filp)
*/ */
rc = 0; rc = 0;
CIFS_I(inode)->time = 0; CIFS_I(inode)->time = 0;
default:
goto cgfi_exit; goto cgfi_exit;
} else if (rc == -EREMOTE) { }
cifs_create_dfs_fattr(&fattr, inode->i_sb);
rc = 0;
} else if (rc)
goto cgfi_exit;
/* /*
* don't bother with SFU junk here -- just mark inode as needing * don't bother with SFU junk here -- just mark inode as needing
* revalidation. * revalidation.
*/ */
cifs_all_info_to_fattr(&fattr, &find_data, cifs_sb, false);
fattr.cf_uniqueid = CIFS_I(inode)->uniqueid; fattr.cf_uniqueid = CIFS_I(inode)->uniqueid;
fattr.cf_flags |= CIFS_FATTR_NEED_REVAL; fattr.cf_flags |= CIFS_FATTR_NEED_REVAL;
cifs_fattr_to_inode(inode, &fattr); cifs_fattr_to_inode(inode, &fattr);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment